Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
@Vishal:
1- all settings (except very few, like hostname) are duplicated between cluster members. So, port addresses as well. As you connect both ports (master and slave) to a L2 switch, this isn't a problem. They even have the same virtual MAC address (which in cheap switches may be a problem...).
2- HBDEV priority isn't about master election. This parameter only distributes heartbeat traffic across multiple HA links (which is a best practice). You influence election by setting "override" and port monitoring. Port monitoring triggers a failover when a monitored port fails. And of course, the monitored port setting is duplicated between cluster members.
Synchronization of the config is identical for A-P and A-A clusters.
You mention stacked switches are you doing a LACP bundle between each FGT200E to each switch member ? Regardless, the A-A or A-P in a stacked env will not matter. I would also ensure ( I believe that you are ) that each HBDEv interfaces are cabled back-2-back and introduce into the switch stack.
So if your looking for the max in HA and with bandwidth you could take fgt-port1+2 and create a bonded interface and cables these to switch members sw1+sw2 and fgt-ports 3+4 as port-member cabled to switch members sw1+sw2
Finally for layer3 interfaces you could easily do 802.1q tagging.
Ken Felix
PCNSE
NSE
StrongSwan
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1660 | |
1077 | |
752 | |
443 | |
220 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.