Hi, I`m having problems with setting up IKEv2 IPSEC with remote site.
What I`ve done:
I`ve imported Certificate via GUI and whole Chain by which this certificate is signeg (Internal CA).
I`ve setup Custom Site-to-Site tunnel.
SA Policies do match.
Hovewer I can see in logs message saying:
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: reassembled fragmented message
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: initiator received AUTH msg
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: received peer identifier DER_ASN1_DN 'CN = RemoteIP, OU = VPN, O = CompanyName, C = UK'
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: Validating X.509 certificate
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: peer cert, subject='RemoteIP', issuer='IPSecCA'
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: peer ID verified
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: building fnbam peer candidate list
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: FNBAM_GROUP_ANY candidate ''
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: certificate validation pending
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: certificate validation complete
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: certificate validation succeeded
ike 0:NVT_BIA:44590: signature verification failed
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
FG Config
FortiGate # show vpn ipsec phase1-interface BIA
config vpn ipsec phase1-interface
edit "BIA"
set interface "wan1"
set ike-version 2
set local-gw LocalIP
set authmethod signature
set peertype any
set proposal aes256-sha256
set dpd disable
set dhgrp 21
set nattraversal disable
set remote-gw RemoteIP
set certificate "VPN3"
next
end
FortiGate # show vpn ipsec phase2-interface BIA
config vpn ipsec phase2-interface
edit "BIA"
set phase1name "BIA"
set proposal aes256-sha256
set dhgrp 21
set src-addr-type name
set dst-addr-type name
set keylifeseconds 28800
set src-name "local_10.254.211.0"
set dst-name "BIA_Remote"
next
end
And still I get signature verification Failed.
VPN3 (Local Certificate) and Remote Certificate are both signed by same CA.
Certificates have CN=Local/RemoteIP
X509v3 Extended Key Usage: TLS Web Client Authentication, ipsec Internet Key Exchange X509v3 Key Usage: critical Digital Signature, Key Encipherment, Data Encipherment
Manual verification of CA and certificates is ok.
Can anyone give me any tip what`s going on?
PSK works fine so it`s not a problem of Policies.
I am having this same problem. Did you ever find out what is happening? It makes absolutely no sense that "certificate validation" is successful but "signature validation" is not.
Everything is the same as your setup; IKEv2, certificates verify properly but "signature" validation fails, with no indication as to why. If I switch to using IKEv1, the connection comes up fine, so it is just a problem with IKEv2.
Anyone at Fortinet around?????
Here's what I did
http://socpuppet.blogspot.com/2018/06/ncp-vpnclient-ikev2-with-fortios-v60.html
I use the subject "field" and set mandatory ca verify to disable
Ken
PCNSE
NSE
StrongSwan
emnoc wrote:Nope, that doesn't work. I am trying to setup an IKEv2 site-to-site using certificate auth. That page you linked to references RA, not S2S.Here's what I did
http://socpuppet.blogspot.com/2018/06/ncp-vpnclient-ikev2-with-fortios-v60.html
I use the subject "field" and set mandatory ca verify to disable
Ken
I did "conf user peer", edited the peer for the remote site, did "set mandatory-ca-verify disable" and "set subject my.domain.com" (which is the exact and only value in the certificate subject name of the peer). I still receive the same error, "signature verification failed". Note that I receive the same error whether the other end is an identical Fortigate device or not - I get the same error when the other end is an ASA.
I really think it's a bug, since changing to IKEv1 (and changing NOTHING ELSE) fixes the problem. The certs are fine.
Regards of if it's RA or S2S the peer concept is the same in both types
To clarify the following;
I`ve imported Certificate via GUI and whole Chain by which this certificate is signeg (Internal CA).
So you imported the CA_Cert into local and remote firewalls and imported both the certificates ( end_users ) into both fortigates?
I just look at a FGT60D to FGT80C and we have the same setup with certificates installed for both FGT signed by a external CA. So in mine we have a chain-depth of CA and FGT1 & FGT2 and in each FGT we imported the CA along with the certificates.
That and as long as you select the certificates for the local and peer, you should be good. I do not see the peer-certificate selected in your cfg dump which seems strange.
Can you double check for
config vpn phase1-interface
edit < blah >
set peer < peer_named_cert>
end
Ken Felix
PCNSE
NSE
StrongSwan
APologies for the delay. Yes, I have exactly what you describe there. Here is the "conf vpn ipsec phase1-interface":
config vpn ipsec phase1-interface edit "1176" set type ddns set interface "wan" set ike-version 2 set keylife 28800 set authmethod signature set proposal aes256-sha256 aes256-sha1 set localid-type asn1dn set dpd disable set comments "VPN: 1176 (Created by VPN wizard)" set nattraversal forced set remotegw-ddns "1176.pLAN9.co" set certificate "FLA_req" set peer "1176_peer" next
Here is the show user peer:
config user peer edit "1176_peer"
set mandatory-ca-verify disable set ca "CA_Cert_1"
set cn "1176.pLAN9.co" next
And "CA_Cert_1" is my CA. The CN of the other side is "CN=1176.pLAN9.co". I have tried adding the "CN=" part to the "set cn" value, and have also tried removing the "set cn" value (on IKEv1 I never had to set this value at all, nor did I have to set the "mandatory-ca-verify" option. It worked fine without these.).
Here is the debug log of a failure:
ike 0:1176:101832: initiator received AUTH msg ike 0:1176:101832: received peer identifier DER_ASN1_DN 'CN = 1176.pLAN9.co' ike 0:1176:101832: Validating X.509 certificate ike 0:1176:101832: peer cert, subject='1176.pLAN9.co', issuer='pLAN9 CA 2019-2021' ike 0:1176:101832: peer ID verified ike 0:1176:101832: building fnbam peer candidate list ike 0:1176:101832: FNBAM_GROUP_NAME candidate '1176_peer' ike 0:1176:101832: certificate validation pending ike 0:1176:101832: certificate validation complete ike 0:1176:101832: certificate validation succeeded ike 0:1176:101832: signature verification failed
I really have no idea why it's failing - Everything looks right (as is typical with most VPN problems I encounter).
I'm probably just going to stay with IKEv1 if I can't get this to work, since IKEv1 already works with the same setup.... IKEv2 doesn't really offer much benefit in S2S setups anyway.
So I finally found the incredibly stupid and insecure solution to this: use SHA1 for the hashing algortithm in Phase 1 and Phase 2. Doing this (and making no other changes to the above config) causes the tunnel to come up without issue.
This is a pretty crap situation; I am forced to use a broken and insecure algorithm in order for the device to even function at all in a IKEv2 cert-based VPN. And this is a "security" device??
I've got a somewhat similar setup with 5.6.8, IKEv2 with certs, etc. and am not using or allowing SHA1.
I think something else must be going on with your setup.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1712 | |
1093 | |
752 | |
447 | |
231 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.