Support Forum
The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts.
lethargos
New Contributor

Routing through VIP - different handling of source ip

Hello,

 

I need help understanding how Fortigate handles two very similar policies.

I've got three vlans with corresponding subinterfaces: 10.20.0.0/16 (project 1), 10.30.0.0/16 (project 2) and 10.40.0.0/16 (project 3).

I've got a VIP mapping 192.168.1.1 (this is actually public, but it's not hugely relevant here) --> 10.30.1.16

When I access the VIP from a server beloning to the same vlan (10.30.1.100), Fortigate changes the source IP from 10.30.1.100 to 10.30.0.1 (so the vlan's gateway).

When I access the VIP from a server belonging to another vlan (10.40.1.12), the receiving server sees the actual ip, so 10.40.1.12.

I can clearly see this in tcpdump and in the packet capture run directly on the Firewall (where the route is for the first scenarion: 10.30.1.100->192.168.1.1->10.30.16 -- and here the ip source changes to 10.30.1.0).

 

The two policies are:

1. interface out - project 1 (subnet 10.30.0.0/16) --> interface in - also project 1 (VIP - 192.168.1.1->10.30.1.16)

2. interfface out - project 3 (subnet 10.40.0.0/16) --> interface in - project 1 (VIP - 192.168.1.1->10.30.1.16)

 

Is this intentional so that it avoid any ip conflict, in case the the packet comes from the server itself (10.30.1.16)?

 

Thank you!

4 REPLIES 4
lobstercreed
Valued Contributor

Are you sure you don't just have NAT enabled on the first policy?  That's the kind of behavior I'd expect if you had NAT enabled on the first policy but not the second one.

lethargos

I've just had a look. No, there's no NAT in the rules themselves that point to the VIP.

 

There is however a general SNAT rule for all three VLANs when the packets go out into the internet. But that shouldn't matter because the destination interface is different (internet-facing one vs the vlan ones) and the packets didn't reach the 10.30.1.16 at all before adding the VIP policies.

lethargos

This was an interesting hint though! I added NAT to the rule, just to see what happens, and interestingly enough, it changed the source ip to the public ip mapping into the VIP, so in my example 192.168.1.1.

So with NAT it's not using the vlan gateway anymore as a source ip.

emnoc
Esteemed Contributor III

"diag debug flow" will show you want policy is being used and what SNAT and DNAT operations. I would run that and post the output or study the output.

 

Ken Felix

 

PCNSE 

NSE 

StrongSwan  

PCNSE NSE StrongSwan
Announcements

Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!

Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.

Labels
Top Kudoed Authors