My current firewall seems to be able to support using CLI
but I want to do using GUI.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
Link monitoring remove static routes.
Vrdst check for static routes?
As the KB is describing, it checks kernel table. All static routes go in there. When the link/interface (set device) specified in the static route goes done all those static routes would be removed. However, if you have a backup path (default route with a high admin distance or priority) to a secondary ISP via a different interface it wouldn't trigger VRRP failover. That's why VRRP/VRDST config has an option:
set ignore-default-route enable
Toshi
Hi I understand. But you can specify the interface in the static route isnt it?
Where do I raise a feature request for vrrp as gui in the partner portal?
What I would do in your topology (based on my guess since you never explained the entire picture) is below:
static route:
8.8.8.8/32 -> wan
0/0->wan
link-monitor:
server IP = 8.8.8.8
set update-static-route enable (default)
VRDST:
set vrdst 8.8.8.8
set ignore-default-route enable
Above is NOT the entire config but you're already familiar with those CLI configs you need. When "wan" link goes down, both static routes will be removed from routing-table. If the link doesn't go down but something is wrong inside of ISP causing no-internet, those routes would stay there. That's when the link-monitor kicks in to remove 8.8.8.8/32 route. Since it would ignore default route, it doesn't put 0/0 route in consideration as a proper matching route for 8.8.8.8. So VRRP failover will be triggered.
Let us know if still doesn't work. At that time, you need to share us the config under those three components, as well out output of diag command "get router info vrrp".
Toshi
VRRP on the switches doesn't make sense to me. You should be running VRRP on the SDWAN-routers that the switches use as their default gateway, or am I misunderstanding something? Please draw a diagram of the network topology, text with arrows between devices doesn't really cut it here.
ASN123 -- link 1 --> R1 with ASN 65000
ASN123 -- link 2 --> R2 with ASN 65000
R1 and R2 have lan interface that are connected together with switch.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1713 | |
1093 | |
752 | |
447 | |
231 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.