Hello All,
I have 2 FGT in A-P Mode running in my organisation connected to two MPLS router (interconnected with trunk link) as outside and two core switches (in Stack) as inside zone. Please refer the attached diagram.
Basically i want to achieve redundancy of my ospf routes from fortigate means if my Acitve FGT port 34 connected with Router 1 goes down then then firewall switchover and all traffic should divert to port 36 of Standby FGT .
Please guide me is this possible with my current diagram ?. If no then what are the changes i need to do in current diagram ? If yes then what are the changes i need to do configure on FGT
Please help
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
The base concept of A-P is both FGT config needs to be identical. Then you can't configure two ports in the same subnet between 34 and 36. Besides, without an L2 switch between the FGTs and routes, if Router1 dies while FGT1 is active the FGT1 can't get to Router2. So you need to place a switch(or cluster of switches) like LAN side.
Then LAN side, for the same reason above, you can't form one LAG/LACP split to A and P device. You have to have two LAG ports on both FGTs. Then you can split two cables from each FGT to two switches so that you have switch redundancy.
If no switch on WAN side, the FGT1 can't reach RT2. Heartbeat connections are just for communication between FGTs, not for user traffic. I would use the same switch cluster on the LAN side for WAN then separate them with VLANs. On LAN side, you want to keep LACP with two port from both FGT (total 4 cables). Then split portA to sw1 and portB to sw2 for each FGT.
Hi Toshi,
Please find attached Updated diagram for your reference. I mean to say if my fgt 1 port 34 goes down then failover of fgt happen and traffic would take port 34 of fgt 2 to forward routes traffic. Correct me if I still wrong. For lan side I'm breaking the lacp link and will use one port from each FGT to connect to one switch port of switches in stack. Will that work ?
WAN side, you don't have FGT redundancy. If FGT1 dies and RT1 is still master of HSRP, FGT2 can't reach RT1.
I'm not sure exactly what you meant. But if you don't use LAG/LACP like in your diagram, you need to design monitoring interfaces + remote link montir (https://kb.fortinet.com/kb/documentLink.do?externalID=FD45518) carefully. Also it's rare but it doesn't cover the case that FGT1+SW2 are down at the same time.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1660 | |
1077 | |
752 | |
443 | |
220 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.