Hello Experts,
This may be a basic item.
Why is Loopback Address necessary at SD-WAN?
Is it used for SLA? If SLA is not important, can we omit it?
Thanks in advance,
Solved! Go to Solution.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
The SD-WAN itself shouldn't require a loopback interface/address on a FGT. But if you have set up two FGTs connected together over multiple VPNs and you put the multiple VPNs in an SD-WAN zone, you might want to set up a common interface/IP on the remote end to ping to with a performance SLA health-check rules so that the local end can measure which path/VPN is the best at a time in order to prefer that path.
My home FGT has SD-WAN for internet traffic steered but no VPNs to the other FGT is a member of a zone. So I don't have/need any loopback interface.
Toshi
The SD-WAN itself shouldn't require a loopback interface/address on a FGT. But if you have set up two FGTs connected together over multiple VPNs and you put the multiple VPNs in an SD-WAN zone, you might want to set up a common interface/IP on the remote end to ping to with a performance SLA health-check rules so that the local end can measure which path/VPN is the best at a time in order to prefer that path.
My home FGT has SD-WAN for internet traffic steered but no VPNs to the other FGT is a member of a zone. So I don't have/need any loopback interface.
Toshi
Dear Toshi,
Thanks for your quick reply. I understood it.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1688 | |
1087 | |
752 | |
446 | |
226 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.