Support Forum
The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts.
netserv
New Contributor

Fortigate not routing request from client

Good evening, 

 

Experiencing an issue with FG Routing can anyonn assist, 

 

I have the following setup on a Proxmox node: 

1. Ubuntu (Client) 

2. Foritgate Firewall 

 

The Client has two interfaces attached with the following networks: 

1. 192.168.61.X for management 

2. 192.168.10.x (shared network to reach the Fortigate) LAN

 

The Fortigate has three interfaces attached with the following networks: 

1. 192.168.61.X for management 

2. 192.168.10.x (shared network to reach the client ) LAN

3. 192.168.100.x (WAN Interface to reach wan router)

 

I cannot get internet on the client through the FG.  I can ping between both the client and the FG on the  192.168.10.0 network but if i try to ping an external network from the client with the FG as the gateway there is no reply. 

 

After running sniffers and debug flow i can see the packet reaching the Fortigate with the following output: 

 

 

 

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # diag deb en

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # diag sniffer packet any 'host 192.168.10.2'
Using Original Sniffing Mode
interfaces=[any]
filters=[host 192.168.10.2]
0.262386 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
1.286294 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
2.310243 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
3.333913 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
4.357761 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
5.382364 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
6.406127 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
7.430170 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
8.453941 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
9.478245 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
10.502422 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
11.526356 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
12.549849 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
13.574263 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
14.598060 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request
^C
18 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # diag deb en

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # diag deb flow filter saddr 192.168.10.2

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # diag debug flow trace start 100

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # id=20085 trace_id=1 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=89."
id=20085 trace_id=1 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-0000047c"
id=20085 trace_id=1 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=2 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=90."
id=20085 trace_id=2 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-0000047d"
id=20085 trace_id=2 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=3 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=91."
id=20085 trace_id=3 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-0000047e"
id=20085 trace_id=3 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=4 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=92."
id=20085 trace_id=4 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-0000047f"
id=20085 trace_id=4 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=5 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=93."
id=20085 trace_id=5 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-00000480"
id=20085 trace_id=5 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=6 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=94."
id=20085 trace_id=6 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-00000481"
id=20085 trace_id=6 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=7 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=95."
id=20085 trace_id=7 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-00000482"
id=20085 trace_id=7 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=8 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=96."
id=20085 trace_id=8 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-00000483"
id=20085 trace_id=8 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=9 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=97."
id=20085 trace_id=9 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-00000484"
id=20085 trace_id=9 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=10 func=print_pkt_detail line=5742 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 192.168.10.2:7->8.8.8.8:2048) from port2. type=8, code=0, id=7, seq=98."
id=20085 trace_id=10 func=init_ip_session_common line=5913 msg="allocate a new session-00000485"
id=20085 trace_id=10 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2621 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-192.168.100.1 via port1"

 

 

there is a statiic route on the Fortigate using the WAN interface and from the FG i can ping anything on the internet so there is internet access on the firewall:

 

 

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # exe ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=114 time=46.1 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=114 time=46.3 ms
^C
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 46.1/46.2/46.3 ms

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # exe ping www.google.com
PING www.google.com (142.251.35.228): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 142.251.35.228: icmp_seq=0 ttl=113 time=46.6 ms
64 bytes from 142.251.35.228: icmp_seq=1 ttl=113 time=46.6 ms
64 bytes from 142.251.35.228: icmp_seq=2 ttl=113 time=46.4 ms
^C
--- www.google.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 46.4/46.5/46.6 ms

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # get router info routing-table connected
Routing table for VRF=0
C       192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, port2
C       192.168.61.0/24 is directly connected, mgmt
C       192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, port1


FortiOS-VM64-KVM # get router info routing-table all
Codes: K - kernel, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, B - BGP
       O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
       * - candidate default

Routing table for VRF=0
S*      0.0.0.0/0 [5/0] via 192.168.100.1, port1
C       192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, port2
C       192.168.61.0/24 is directly connected, mgmt
C       192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, port1

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # get router info routing-table
details      show routing table details information
all          show all routing table entries
rip          show rip routing table
ospf         show ospf routing table
bgp          show bgp routing table
isis         show isis routing table
static       show static routing table
connected    show connected routing table
database     show routing information base

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # get router info routing-table database
Codes: K - kernel, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, B - BGP
       O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
       > - selected route, * - FIB route, p - stale info

Routing table for VRF=0
S    *> 0.0.0.0/0 [5/0] via 192.168.100.1, port1
S       192.168.10.0/24 [10/0] via 192.168.10.1, port2
C    *> 192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, port2
C    *> 192.168.61.0/24 is directly connected, mgmt
C    *> 192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, port1

 

 

 

Based on the debugs it seems fortigate cannot find a route once the intial packet comes from the LAN network but has no trouble if the traffic initiates from itself. 

 

can anyone assist in troubleshooting issue.

 

Here is how the interfaces are setup on the host (Proxmox). 

 

Proxmox networking setup.png

 

thanks for your assistance. 

 

regards, 

#fortigate, #proxmox

1 Solution
AlexC-FTNT
Staff
Staff

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # diag sniffer packet any 'host 192.168.10.2'
0.262386 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request

This shows the request is sent out with the source IP of port2
The routing table, shows both routes present, but ony the one over port1 being active in the routing table.

S    *> 0.0.0.0/0 [5/0] via 192.168.100.1, port1
S       192.168.10.0/24 [10/0] via 192.168.10.1, port2

So you need to run the capture:

diag sniffer packet any 'host 192.168.10.2' 4 0 
to show the port that is being used. This is to make sure that port1 is not used with the source IP of port2 - In that case , it will not receive any reply (which is your case).


- Toss a 'Like' to your fixxer, oh Valley of Plenty! and chose the solution, too00oo -

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
Anthony_E
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hello,

 

Thanks a lot for your contribution in Community.

 

May I propose you to have a look in our Knowledge Base, under this section:

 

https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/tkb-p/TKB20?pageNum=1

 

You will find articles concerning FortiGate which could help you.

 

If you do not find any answers do not hesitate to come back to us, we will find somebody to help you.

 

Regards,

Anthony-Fortinet Community Team.
akristof
Staff
Staff

Hello,


Thank you for your question. I am not sure if the debug flow output is full, but I would start with enabling NAT on the firewall policy allowing traffic from port2 to port1. Because the debug flow itself looks ok, FortiGate is able to find route via port1, but I don't see any info about policy that the traffic is matching or if SNAT is enabled. Also, routing-table looks correct.

Adrian
AlexC-FTNT
Staff
Staff

FortiOS-VM64-KVM # diag sniffer packet any 'host 192.168.10.2'
0.262386 192.168.10.2 -> 8.8.8.8: icmp: echo request

This shows the request is sent out with the source IP of port2
The routing table, shows both routes present, but ony the one over port1 being active in the routing table.

S    *> 0.0.0.0/0 [5/0] via 192.168.100.1, port1
S       192.168.10.0/24 [10/0] via 192.168.10.1, port2

So you need to run the capture:

diag sniffer packet any 'host 192.168.10.2' 4 0 
to show the port that is being used. This is to make sure that port1 is not used with the source IP of port2 - In that case , it will not receive any reply (which is your case).


- Toss a 'Like' to your fixxer, oh Valley of Plenty! and chose the solution, too00oo -
Announcements

Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!

Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.

Labels
Top Kudoed Authors