Hi allI am supposed to configure OSPF peering between a Fortigate and a
Meraki Hub (MX?). Unfortunately there is not much to configure on Meraki
side (it has the correct ospf ID and an unique router ID and identical
Hello and Dead timeouts). So I sup...
Dear all I have configured an explicit proxy on at fgt100F with
6.4.15.The goal is to use kerberos as an authentication. Unfortunately
this doesn't work yet. To start with I disabled the autbentication need
on the proxy policy and let the customer te...
Hi all I can't wrap my head around this features. I might be
misunderstanding everything. In the Explicit Proxy feature of the
Fortigate there is a parameter called "Default Firewall Policy Action"
which can be set to "Accept" or "Deny".However, I do...
Hi all There is a customer that uses tons of 60E and 60F models of each
FortiGates and FortiWifis. I am aware that using a config from one FGT
60F to another FGT 60F (and the same within 60E) should work - but not
from 60F to 60E and vice versa (at l...
Hello everyone We still have some FP421E active which are managed by a
fortigate. We are aware that those are end of support, end of sale, end
of everything... Unfortunately I have difficulties to find an official
(old) compatibility list with these ...
Thank you very much for your reply - that worked without issues.I
changed the network 10.x.x.x/23 to the new (sub)area and it was a) still
advertised via 0.0.0.0 and b) the neighbor peering with Meraki came up
as "full"!Thank you again!
Thank you very much for your reply and your explanation.That makes
(partial) sense - unfortunately the name "implicit deny" in the proxy
policies confused me.It isn't an implicit deny after all - as you can
switch its behaviour to a implicit accept w...
I am sorry - it solved itself.I had to look under FortiAP-W2 (which I
wasn't aware of) -
https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortiap/6.4.0/fortiap-and-fortios-compatibility-matrix/209640/fortiap-w2
