I configured trunks on my fortiswitch to structure the double port of my
APs in LACP. on the access points I ran the same command:cfg -a
FAP_ETHER_TRUNK=2but on a graphic level the trunk on the switch side
remains red. I can see the switch through th...
I have configured two WANs on my fortigate 100F.I wrote two routes to
the 0.0.0.0/0 network with the same weight and priority.one that points
to wan1 and one that points to wan2.and I would like to ensure that the
PCs in group 1 navigate with wan1 an...
I connected a FortiGate 100F to a FortiSwitch 248E-FPOE using four
cables to set up a 4-gigabit trunk.Then, I connected a U231F access
point to ports 3 and 4 of this switch, with the network interfaces
configured in uplink and LACP enabled to achieve...
it is possible with my u231f access point to use the lan1 and lan2 port
in aggregate mode. and take advantage of 2 gbits of bandwidth?? what do
I have to do on the Access point side and what do I have to do on the
fortiswitch side to do this???
I purchased a 100F firewall and three 248E-FPOE switches.How can I
connect the devices together giving 2Gbits of bandwidth to each switch.I
can aggregate the ports but how can I separate three FortiLink
interfaces for the three switches. ??I'm missin...
I opened the switch cli and this is the message I get when running the
command you described# conf switch trunkambiguous command before
'switch'Command fail. Return code 1
the SSID is in bridge mode and the files is hosted in two pc desktop.
notebook 1 download from desktop 1 and notebook 2 download from desktop
2. 300 Mbps is really low compared to the theoretical 1.2 Gbps, leaving
aside LACP for the moment.
I'm missing a step. due to my lack of knowledge.I saw that on the
fortigate side I can configure a single fortilink interface (red
rectangle).But if I need to connect multiple switches as in the figure,
each one with LACP trunks to have more bandwidt...
