Hey all, I've been having great luck with the 5G FortiExtender FEX-511F
and T-Mobile even though they don't officially support the device.
However, I just ran into an issue with a deployment to a new data center
where T-Mobile has absolutely zero cov...
Curious if anyone knows of a directive which can be used to force an
FEX-511F FortiExtender into an LTE-only mode instead of allowing 5G? I
have one of these that I'm trying to make use of with T-Mobile. I'm in
an area where there's plenty of strong ...
Just wanted to let someone know that after replying to an eight year old
thread I'd started, I was left on a page where all the links are
apparently to your staging site and not the production forum:
Maybe I'm missing something, but with the conversion from the old
Fortinet forums to this new community software, is there no longer any
categorization so you can simply read through threads on a topic of
interest to see if any apply to you? I used t...
When adding a Virtual IP mapping, i.e. 1:1 NAT, the Fortigate has an
Interface box, which you'd think would actually perform some role, such
as isolating the NAT to the interface in question. In reality, adding a
Virtual IP seems to affect traffic to...
I can see how labels function, but it doesn't seem to create effective
improvement. If I click FortiGate, instead of 14,000 pages I only have a
few hundred pages, categorized in no more specific way (i.e. vpn or
other sub-cats that had been present),...
toshiesumi wrote:I still don't understand what you're trying to do. You
were saying that you set a VIP from the public-facing IP (say x.x.x.x)
to a private IP, which inside of your network. But, isn't that x.x.x.x
the IP those dial-up VPNs are connec...
Nope; I have a feeling that only works if using the Fortigate itself as
the DNS server or proxy... ugh. I've done rules-based 1:1 NAT on a
pfsense before, super easy, but apparently this isn't an easy problem to
solve with Fortigate. It's pretty weir...
