Hi. I recently replaced a FGT 200E (running 5.6.x) with a FGT 201F
(6.2.x) where I lightly modified the configuration.The new firewall
(201F running 6.2.7) now shows high cpu usage on one alternating core.
CLI and diagnose sys top showsRun Time: 0 da...
Hi. I manage something like 10 sites that each have a fortigate fw, a dc
that replicate with the rest of the sites, a wireless nettwork
(cisco/aerohive/meru), an nps at each site. The users are mainly tree
groupsadminteachersstudents Teachers are abl...
Hi! I'm trying to crack the code behind this Fortigate, and must admit
I'm not there yet.Given the schematic below, how do I get a public IP
behind a fortigate in NAT mode without adding a second transparent
v-dom.Thanks!
Hi. I'm waiting on Fortinet to create a new firmware. Seems to be a bug.
Its possible to disable FSSO polling and or change the ports that fsso
usesconfig system fsso-polling set listening-port <8400> config user
fsso set port <8400>Referance:
https:...
I'm having a couple of fortigate firewalls(100D/200D) running some
businesses, and was considering to check out the FortiAPs instead of
what the Ap's we got now, but this thread doesn't look very promising...
Really thanks for all your answers! So why do I want't this? Well, it's
a learning by doing, one has to fail (or learn by others faults) to get
the knowledge of why and how. And I do agree that subnet overlapping
doesn't sound like a good idea. I jus...
So lets see. I don't have a 192.168.3.x network. The wan side has the
192.168.1.x network. And I'm trying to get the same 1.x network to one
(or many) hosts behind the firewall with the only vdom in use in
NAT-mode. When I try to set the ip addess fo...
Sorry for not clarifying enough. In the diagram I used 192.168.1.x/24 as
the "public" ip. I know the 192.168.x.x are not public, but the routing
/ nat / setup should be the same. So I'm pretending the 192.168.1.x is
my real address here. And sure eno...
