Hi! I have a strange issue. On our 800C (V5.2.6) Cluster, i create a new
IPSEC Policy Rule..like many others. But this rule seemsnot to be
triggered.Source is 10.98.42.xxx and Dest is 192.168.199.100 Flow
Diag:id=20085 trace_id=27 func=print_pkt_deta...
Hi all! I have a problem routing a WLAN SSID to a dedicated wan port. -
I have one default gateway, routing anything to WAN1. - I have rules
allowing traffic from Internal AND WiFi to WAN1 So long, anything is
working from network internal and WiFi. ...
Good Morning! One feature i would like to see on the fortigate 60, would
be a loadbalance on the two WAN ports. So we could use two adsl lines
for expample and route the traffic to either ports, depending what port
has less traffic. A indicator could...
Hello all! I search through the forums but i dont find an answer. How
can i make a port forwarding for a port-range, like as an example "
33100 - 33200" ? (FG on ADSL, one dyn ip on ext, inoff ip-net on
internal) The only way i find in OS2.5 is to ma...
Hello, can someone answer if the smallest fortigate can handle cerberian
filter lists in a 5-user env. , with also AV/NIDS enabled ? I read here
something about the " old" fg-50, that this one has memory limitations.
Also, is the 50A captable of runn...
Yes, it is. Sorry but iam completly confused. The vpn policy is nearly
on top and the common nat-rule is at nearly end.And i have no idea why
this rule is not triggered.- checked source network/mask- check
destination network/mask(src interface=inter...
I have policy-based ipsec rules, no routing entrys. I have no ipsec
interface mode. Therefore , there is no routing entry for the private
subnet..nor for the others that are working.
