Hello all, with json options, a Google Chrome-based web browser can be
easily configured globally on a Linux system. This allows you to enforce
settings in all areas for all users of a Linux desktop/terminal server.
This has the advantage that you do...
Hello all, i tested here 2 things: Fortigate 60E + Fortiexender 201E and
Fortigate 51E + Fortiexender 201E On both it is working fine. With and
without ip-passthrough (capwap). So the goal is in this situation
"Fortigate 51E + Fortiexender 201E". But...
Has anyone ever managed to connect a Fortigate with SSO/SAML using
Keycloak? For Login Administrators.I have already spent many days with
it and failed in all directions. UCS is used as the Keycloak backend
(LDAP)
Hello all, I'am using here an Fortigate 60E with some AP's an one fresh
Fortiexender 201E. With strange OS Version "FXT201E-v4.2.5-build519".
Strange because the fortigate is on 7.4.x. The Status is, everything is
working fine, but under the Fortigat...
Hello all, Affected: FortiOS 6 to 7.2.4. Webbrowser, Devices, everything
that is not Windows.If you have Certificate Inspection, deep inspection
enabled, Windowsupdates are not possibel anymore. To only way is to
import the CA in the Fortigate. But t...
Thank you for your response. It is possible that performance issues may
arise in future versions. If this is the case, please feel free to open
an issue on GitHub, and I will look into it.
Unfortunately not. I also tried to solve it directly with Fortis
Support. It is certainly possible, but this would probably require
bringing Forti + Keycloak/Univention together and letting them work.
@FortiMax_it wrote:For IPsec VPNs with Android I solved the problem by
removing DES and 3DES in phase 1 and phase 2 and putting SHA-128Did not
changed my situation here... 4 mobilephones, every phone the same
behaviour. 2 Fairphones, one Samsung and ...
Same here on 7.2.4.0138 on IPSEC Dialup. I have debuged with global src
filter. And if i connect, nothing on the fortigate. No reacation.
diagnose sniffer packet any 'host x.x.x.x' SSL-VPN is working. But that
is not what we use here. Here are older ...
