I noticed after upgrading mye fortigate 200b to 4.0 mr3 patch 2
(previously I ran the latest mr2 specific fortiap build). I also got the
latest 219 build on the access points. Here is one of the clients
(probably an samsung galaxy s that we got quite...
After upgrading a 200B to 4.0 MR3 patch 2 I can see a strange increase
in cpu and memory usage in cmdbsvr: Run Time: 2 days, 21 hours and 29
minutes 16U, 17S, 67I; 1009T, 398F, 194KF cmdbsvr 29 S 20.8 17.3
proxyworker 54 S 4.8 5.7 ipsengine 60 S < 3....
I got a Fortigate 100A working as a router/firewall for personal users.
We are changing the ISP at the front, and we got all public IP' s. What
I would like to do is to keep the old connection as a backup, as well as
serve the internet connection unt...
ORIGINAL: Selective one more thing, you dont need to change the port
10443, leave it alone, and do a VIP instead, WAN1 on port 443 -> WAN1 on
port 10443 (and of course choose another IP than the interface IP) What
do you mean with choosing another IP...
I have been running the update I got from Fortinet support for around 4
days now. The CPU usage and memory usage are way better than before, so
it might seem like they have fixed the bug.
I just got a firmware update from fortinet. According to Fortinet the
problem was: Engineering could isolate this bug and fix it. It was
related to an issue with API when trying to save certificate during
wireless renegotiation.
Support is slow... I got this from support today: This issue looks
similar to the bug ' 0155391' which reports " Memory leak observed by
cmdbsvr process and Wireless Controller during associations "
