- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
FortiSIEM: Multi-Site HA Connectivity & Supervisor Access without Exposing Internal IPs
Version: 7.3.0
Hypervisor: KVM
1. Multi-Site HA Configuration (Automatic HA):
We are planning HA with Multi-Site:
Site 1: 2 Supervisors
Site 2: 1 Supervisor
The requirement is to achieve less than 100ms latency for communication between these sites.
Will this communication occur at Layer 2 or Layer 3? Any recommendations on how to establish this connectivity?
2. MSSP Configuration for Supervisor Access:
In an MSSP setup, the customer wants to provide their clients with access to the Supervisors at the Organization level but without exposing their internal IP addresses.
What would be the best approach to achieve this?
- Labels:
-
FortiSIEM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Arif,
Let me find a FortiSIEM expert for you :)!
Regards,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello Arif,
Please apologies for the delay. I am still looking for someone to help you.
Regards,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @beingarif,
1. Multi-Site-HA:
In general, layer 2 or layer 3 does not really matter for your requirement. The latency is not based on the fact if there is a router in the middle, but on the physical distance, the devices in between or on encryption (e.g. because of VPN-tunnels) between the sites. In case you have VPN, routing (layer 3) usually is easier to set up. For HA-setup with a single virtual IP (instead of using a load-balancer in front), layer 2 might be faster in the setup. It very much depends on more aspects than you wrote here and that's the reason why companies like mine or even Fortinet (Professional Services) take money for deeper consulting.
Anyways, the traffic between workers (you did not mention them?) can be very bandwidth-consuming, so you want to avoid any bottle necks there.
2. Supervisor access:
I don't quite understand your requirements here. Are you deploying the supervisor(s) on site of the customer or at a central location - meaning: Do all the tenants need to go through the internet to access the supervisor(s) or is it placed on their local network?
In any case, you can do DNAT as you can do with any server.
On the other hand, if you just want to hide IP-addresses on the GUI for tenants, you can look through user roles, there is an option for that.
Best,
Christian
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
