This forum is for all security enthusiasts to discuss Fortinet's latest & evolving technologies and to connect & network with peers in the cybersecurity hemisphere. Share and learn on a broad range of topics like best practices, use cases, integrations and more. For support specific questions/resources, please visit the Support Forum or the Knowledge Base.
[First published on Fortinet Interest Group at LinkedIn]
Two FG60D (NAT/route-mode) in HA - connected as attached sketch. This works fine, except from the dashed lines. If I create one virtual switch for purple and one for green lines, I get an ethernet loop. So - I could enable stpforward on the interface. This does not make any difference. The doc states that I could enable spanning-tree on "low-end FortiGate units that are in "switch mode" - but this is not possible (http://bit.ly/2gyFYtt). (Is "switch mode" another word for transparent mode?) Then I could use redundant interfaces - but this is not available on models below FG100D.
So - does this mean that this setup is not possible to achieve? The doc is vague at best on this.
-- Bjørn Tore
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.