Dear Community, a few days ago, I wanted to clean up some old config
settings on our fortigate cluster. Right now, we have a zone for guest
access. In this zone, we have two members. One vap (guest ssid; tunnel
to wireless controller) interface with ...
Hello everybody, I have a problem what I really don' t understand. Since
we upgraded our IE (Windows 7 x64) to IE10 or IE11 we ran into a
problem. If you open the IE and navigate to a https site (for example
https://www.google.com) the IE loads for a...
Hello guys, first of all, I' am totally new to ipv6. I have heared much
about it (in theory) but I have never laid my hands on it. At our
headquarter we have a /48 network (pa space) which is currently NOT in
use (we are planning the ipv6 implementat...
Hello everybody, I have a question and hope you can help me. I have set
up a captive portal and everythings works fine like I planned it. But
there is one issue I ran into, that I didn' t plan with. If the traffic
which triggers the captive portal is...
Hello everybody, I have a question regarding ssl-vpn authentication.
Today we use username/password for authenticating our ssl-vpn users.
This is okay, but I want to add a little bit more security to it. About
six months ago we implemented a root and...
So, with FortiOS 5.4, prefix delegation is *finally* supported. Before I
start reconfiguring my FWF60D, I wanted to ask if someone got this up
and running?!
Sorry, but that is also not possible. The "FortiClient Service
Scheduler" (Service Name = FA_Scheduler) is as well "proteced" as the
reg keys are. I also can't kill the fmon process because a new fmon
process spawns instantly. Fortinet does a hell of...
We have the exact same situation. We want to disable the realtime
protection for a short period of time (a software rollout). Our
FortiClients are centrally managed via our FortiGate. Sadly we are
unable (even with the following command to change the...
That might be an explanation why 5.2 handles things other than 5.0, but
it does not explain why things are handled different on lan and wifi
(and if there are any intentions to handle them in the same way in
future releases). And my problem still exi...
That is simply not true! The disclaimer types "authentication",
"disclaimer only" and "email collection" are new, that is right. But the
disclaimer type "disclaimer+authentication" was the (only) default type
since the captive portal feature was intr...