Hi, We have a problema with a Fortigate 61E with 110~120 users. FortiOS:
5.4.5With:WebfilterAplication ControlIPSSSL Inspection The customer have
Three links, one of 20mbps full, and two others of 10mbps each, for
failover only. But, the Fortigate 61...
Hi All, I have a HA and when I create a new administrator, the checksum
is not matching, If I delete this user's, checksum is matching. I
verified, and, I see the problem is with password hash between slave and
master. Any other setting are applied w...
I need to customize an internet access report, organized by day,
containing the websites that users have accessed. I created one that
already does this, however I need to generate a report for each user, as
image1.jpg: Has anyone ever created one tha...
Hi, We have a Fortigate HA with load balance all enabled, and we are
monitoring the behavior, and I can see many retransmissions between
slave and master, just when the slave unit process the packet, see this
picture: Anyone known if this is normal? ...
I totally agree with dbert84, we need a solution provided by Fortinet,
simply saying to access an HTTP site first is not solution. I have a
case exactly like this and the engineer's recommendation was this.
hzhao_FTNT wrote:Hi there, we do not support user customized drill-down
chart since 5.0. Please clone your report and set report filter to
different users. regards,hz Hi hzhao_FTNT, Yes, I do this, but, We have
200 users. :( Any other option? Regards...
Hi, I have the same problem with FA VM 5.2.5, but, I´ve tried upper and
lower case. :) We are testing FG + FA VM, but the FG is configured as
One-Arm Sniffer on three interfaces, and I can see the users on
Webfilter, App Ctrl, AV, and others.In FA VM...
But without the load balance, I do not have any advantage using
active-active, right? I do not have this UTM HA. vjoshi wrote:Hello
Lucas, Weird, I expect it to happen, but without any traffic doesn't
seem to be correct. I would recommend not to use ...
