Planning on doing some route-map and prefix-list renaming. When testing
i didn't see any impact when i just create new routing objects with the
same content but different names. When i then change them for example at
router bgp route-map-in or out it...
I noticed that in Policy & Objects there is at CLI Configurations >
Objects > router some router objects like prefix-list and route-map.
This seems to achieve something when first wanting to use a prefix-list
or route-map for example in the Device BG...
In a FGCP cluster trying to get session sync traffic over the dedicated
interface with the set session-sync-dev command. But the corresponding
diagnose output seems to indicate it doesn't work. fgt1 (root) #
diagnose sys ha session-sync-devHA sessync...
anyone experience with a virtual (VM) standalone FortiTester on ESXi
with 2 ports and trying to run a DUT Working Mode Network Address
Translation (NAT) test with a DUT role Network Gateway? with an TP
(transparent) DUT working mode setting or an app...
I don't think so. To be honest I don't see this ever happening, it
doesn't match with how FortiSwitch managed by FortiGate is setup. If
anyone with the right contacts can ever ask this of FortiSwitch product
development that would be helpful.
thanks, yeah i understand it depends on what i change. but when i dont
change anything, just replace route-map with one with another name but
the same content. will that still have some effect, short interruption
or such?
In the end it seemed to be a FortiGate 60E issue, it worked fine on
other models with an output like below. diagnose sys ha session-sync-dev
HA sessync ports: 2 probe: HA connected, Standalone probe,
peer_mac = 00:00:00:00:00:00 HB pkts: rx=55, tx=5...
