Hello everyone, I created a local-in policy as described in this
example:
https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-Local-in-policy-using-ISDB-as-a-source-address/ta-p/323085Overall,
the policy works, but for some reason, some IP addr...
Hello everyone, I set up a Dialup IPSec tunnel between two FortiGates.
The remote FortiGate connects to the server via an external LTE modem.
Port forwarding is configured on the modem. If the connection is lost,
the tunnel isn't automatically reesta...
Hallo everyone. I recently started working for a company that has this
network topology.I see that the Aruba switches are set to MСLAG with
Fortiswitches, but from the Fortiswich side there are no MCLAG settings.
At the same time, Fortiswiches are on...
Hi AEK, I see in the list of addresses blocked by local policy several
addresses that are contained in the problematic database. By the way,
over the last day I discovered two unblocked addresses, which were
contained in two different databases.This ...
The IPsec channel crashes approximately once a day. It seems to me that
if this were the reason, the connection would drop much more often. But
I'll try to check this parameter.
Here is the log after reboot:ike V=root:0:wan: IP 192.168.2.2 addedike
V=root:0:VPN_Test_TSw1:VPN_Test_TSw1: IPsec SA connect 5
192.168.2.2->105.109.199.30:0ike V=root:0: cache rebuild startike
V=root:0:VPN_Test_TSw1: local:0.0.0.0, remote:105.109.19...
Hi @fricci_FTNT ,thank you for your answer, but what about nod-level
redundency? If one of the Aruba switches is disconnected, traffic will
simply go through the second switch, am I right?
