You are leaving our website

Sparh_Hsieh · 12-17-2017

Hi Experts, Our company is building a new environment for our customer and we are using two Fortigate 100D(s) for L3 High Availability and two L2 switches which running MLAG(Cisco concept = VPC) mechanism. Definitely, the server is connecting to thos...

Sparh_Hsieh · 01-02-2018

Hi Toshi & Mike, First of all, thank you for your answer over all. Just update the latest information of our implementation.After discuss the MLAG mechanism with switch's vendor, the data traffic can pass by this "MLAG peer-link"Thus, we still use on...

Sparh_Hsieh · 12-24-2017

Hi Toshi, Sorry, I cannot get your tips exactly, could you please provide more information to me or more explanation.What do you mean to force the active(left) FG to give up the control to the standby(right) FG, a switch-over.

Sparh_Hsieh · 12-18-2017

Hi Toshi, Just a simple question, if you don't have set up LACP between FGs and switches, which mean each switch only has one physical uplink cable. Will HA function of two FGs work properly? Of course, those two switches still interactives MLAG mech...

Sparh_Hsieh · 12-18-2017

toshiesumi wrote:However, if you've set up LACP with two stacked switches, even if one physical link goes down from SW-A, the active unit can still operate through another link with SW-B. So I would just monitor the aggregated link. Thank you for you...

Sparh_Hsieh · 12-18-2017

Just update some assumption from my knowledge, Maybe somebody can provide any tips to me. I knew that I have to configure Monitor Port function for both Fortigate 100D devices. Thus, if SW-A is down, Active 100D will detect the Monitor Port is down, ...

User Statistics

User Activity

Will this HA scenario working properly?

Re: Will this HA scenario working properly?

Re: Will this HA scenario working properly?

Re: Will this HA scenario working properly?

Re: Will this HA scenario working properly?

Re: Will this HA scenario working properly?