Support Forum
The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts.
SOD
New Contributor

lot of session clash port 0

Hi,

I've got a lot of message of session clash on my forti like this :

 

<190>date=2017-11-24 time=13:44:08 devname=MyForti devid=XXXXXXXXXXX logid=0100020085 type=event subtype=system level=information vd="[style="background-color: #ffff00;"]Myvdom[/style]" logdesc="session clash" status="clash" proto=41 msg="session clash"

 

new_status="state=00030204 tuple-num=2 policyid=12 dir=0 act=1 hook=4 11.14.17.10:0->11.201.17.19:0(217.69.23.163:0) dir=1 act=2 hook=0 11.201.17.19:0->217.69.23.163:0(11.14.17.10:0)"

 

old_status="state=00010204 tuple-num=2 policyid=12 dir=0 act=1 hook=4 11.106.16.48:0->11.201.17.19:0(217.69.23.163:0) dir=1 act=2 hook=0 11.201.17.19:0->217.69.23.163:0(11.106.16.48:0)"

 

Session stat shows

misc info:     session_count=19559 setup_rate=341 exp_count=55 clash=[style="background-color: #ffff00;"]104818[/style]     memory_tension_drop=37850 ephemeral=0/589824 removeable=0 delete=0, flush=0, dev_down=0/0 TCP sessions:      55 in NONE state      4142 in ESTABLISHED state      58 in SYN_SENT state      2 in SYN_RECV state      29 in FIN_WAIT state      213 in TIME_WAIT state      225 in CLOSE state      467 in CLOSE_WAIT state

 

it's strange that the traffic show 0 and both source/destination port. I see on the web that it's something to do with IP fragmentation (maybe  a network scan). I've tried to create a policy to denied  all traffic to the wan with a TCP/UDP port 0, but it doesn't effect.

 

Is there a solution to avoid this issue ? Thanks for the help.

 

4 REPLIES 4
packetpusher
Contributor

SOD

Hmm understand, so I have to provide another public ip

emnoc
Esteemed Contributor III

Yes your ephemeral  port is exhausted you need more SNAT pools or find out the root cause of the  clash

e.g

 

infected hosts

misbehaving  clients

malware

too  much traffic

etc.....

 

PCNSE 

NSE 

StrongSwan  

PCNSE NSE StrongSwan
jhouvenaghel_FTNT

Hello,

 

According to the message :

date=2017-11-24 time=13:44:08 devname=MyForti devid=XXXXXXXXXXX logid=0100020085 type=event subtype=system level=information vd="[<font]Myvdom" logdesc="session clash" status="clash" proto=41 msg="session clash"

The protocol number is 41 which would mean it would be IPv6 encapsulation in IPv4. If it is the case, it would be logical that there is no port number

Labels
Top Kudoed Authors