Hello,
I'm new here, i have installed forticlient 7.4 in ubuntu 24.04.
I was connected to my VPN server. after a week when i tried to reconect i had this error "config DNS failed".
these are the logs from the forticlient:
20241212 13:01:50.744 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:INFO] main:2168 Init
20241212 13:01:50.744 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:INFO] main:2186 VPN is running in restore DNS mode
20241212 13:01:50.750 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:INFO] nettools:1854 More than one device with index 2 can be found
20241212 13:01:50.751 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:INFO] nettools:1854 Device address details: local_address xx.xx.xx.xx, device_index 2, device name eth0 (read from netlink)
20241212 13:01:50.751 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:INFO] nettools:1854 Device address details: local_address xxxx::xxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx, device_index 2, device name eth0 (read from netlink)
20241212 13:01:50.781 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:DEBG] vpn_util:299 Get connection name: netplan-eth0
20241212 13:01:50.791 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:INFO] nmtools:865 Network Manager settings backup file doesn't exist
20241212 13:01:50.791 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:DEBG] nmtools:1200 No connections to restore
20241212 13:01:50.791 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:DEBG] dns:302 File /etc/nm_resolv.forticlient.backup doesn't exist
20241212 13:01:50.826 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:DEBG] vpn_util:299 List fctvpn connection: netplan-eth0
lo
br-0174ab01e3e8
docker0
br-0174ab01e3e8
docker0
20241212 13:01:50.826 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:DEBG] dns:982 default interface restore: 1, vpn interface restore: 1
20241212 13:01:50.827 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:DEBG] mtu:121 Restore MTU.
20241212 13:01:50.827 TZ=+0200 [sslvpn:DEBG] mtu:125 No MTU backup file was found. Skip.
Any ideas how to solve this?
Thank you
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hello Antony,
I identified the issue as a problem with the eth0 network interface when it is managed by NetworkManager. It appears the error was caused by two interfaces being configured with the same settings—likely a misconfiguration on my part.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Best regards,
Apostolis
Hello apstav,
Thank you for using the Community Forum. I will seek to get you an answer or help. We will reply to this thread with an update as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Hello Antony,
I identified the issue as a problem with the eth0 network interface when it is managed by NetworkManager. It appears the error was caused by two interfaces being configured with the same settings—likely a misconfiguration on my part.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Best regards,
Apostolis
Thanks a lot for sharing your solution :) and never hesitate to open a discussion in the forum when needed :)
Hey!
We got the same error, it appears to be related to this bug > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2089930
How did u fix it?
I was experiencing the same issue where my VPN wouldn't connect properly when Docker was running. The problem was related to conflicts between the Docker-managed network interfaces and NetworkManager. Specifically, NetworkManager was trying to manage Docker’s interfaces (docker0 and br-*), leading to duplicate configurations and routing conflicts.
I’m not sure if the rest of you are experiencing the same issue, but I hope my solution can help someone.
To resolve the issue, I excluded Docker’s network interfaces from being managed by NetworkManager. This prevents NetworkManager from interfering with Docker's networking and allows the VPN to work correctly.
Here’s how to do it:
Edit the NetworkManager Configuration
Add a rule to ignore Docker interfaces. Open the configuration file:
Add the Following Lines
Insert the following under the [keyfile] section:
Restart NetworkManager
Apply the changes by restarting NetworkManager:
Restart Docker
After restarting NetworkManager, restart Docker to ensure the interfaces are configured correctly:
Man u're a beast!!! Thank u very much, literally saved my end of year :)
Created on 12-31-2024 07:40 AM Edited on 12-31-2024 07:41 AM
As a side comment this also fixes the Config routing table failed issue in our Ubuntu systems. Not sure if Fortinet can take a look at this to try and come up with a fix, it would be greatly appreciated! Our Windows and macOS users have never had an issue with the Forticlient.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1740 | |
1109 | |
752 | |
447 | |
240 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2025 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.