Support Forum
The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts.
Edmond
New Contributor

Zoom Meeting issue

Using FG-201E and 2 wan link for Internet.  I have a problem on using zoom meeting. If a lot of user join a same session meeting, the quality is poor. Most likely reach above 50 users. 

Any best practice guide / tuning recommendation?

Thanks.

 

8 REPLIES 8
pciurea
Staff
Staff

Hello Edmond its nice to have you in this community.

Are you using SDWAN to load balance traffic between the two links? (https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/6.2.10/cookbook/19246/sd-wan)

Zoom has the following bandwidth requirements:

https://onlinezoomappdownload.com/zoom-bandwidth-requirements-and-participant-bandwidth-limits/

Those values does not seem much, but they add up the more users are using the application.

I would keep an eye out for bandwidth exhaustion.

If you are not using SDWAN yet, I would advise to implement it and use the application steering - https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.0.2/administration-guide/125874/application-steering-...

 

Cheers 

"Serenity now. Insanity later"
Edmond
New Contributor

We are using policy route to separate the traffic in Internet link. As my observation both of WAN link usage is not really high. Session is also same as normal. 

Don't know what is the bottleneck. 

Toshi_Esumi
Esteemed Contributor III

Are those 50 users at the same location behind the FGT? When I was troubleshooting Zoom related problem last time, I noticed most of UDP packets directly communicates between client devices. Don't go to the cloud. So if they're on the same LAN, those don't even come to the GW FGT. I would look at LAN bottleneck if that's the case.

Edmond
New Contributor

Thanks for your information. All those run on same network. Currently, local LAN connect to gigabit switch and with 10G backbones. I check out the zoom bandwidth requirement is not high.

How you troubleshoot last time?

Toshi_Esumi
Esteemed Contributor III

The issue I was looking at last time was screen share sometimes didn't start right away. So I assumed some packet losses somewhere. I ran packet capture at a presenter and perticipant machine then run it at the local FGT. But those losses and retransmissions didn't seem to be caused by the local FGT. The location's internet goes over a VPN to get to another FGT on the other end of the tunnel. So I was looking at packet capture at the other FGT to capture the moment.

Since I couldn't get enough information from Zoom support, I really couldn't find it out before the symptom suddenly stopped happening. That peer-to-peer direct video or screen data exchange was discovered during the process in those PCAPs.

Edmond

After getting the tips, I monitor the traffic route and packet size. Today I have a call, 2 Presenter and participant 100. I trial a zoom webinar instead of meeting. Really strange,  presentation quality is good, but sound is sometime bad in local same network user. However, present and sound is good run as wifi (different subnet) whatever mobile or notebook  in same site same wan link. 

Also, monitor the WAN traffic going to same zoom server. Local wired PC is around 400-500B packet, Wireless notebook/mobile is around 40-80Mb per session during 1 hour. Most user are run on wired PC, only around 10 client wireless. Likely you said that peer-to-peer data exchange at LAN environment. 

pseixas
New Contributor

Do you have policy DoS enable ?! I already had the problems because policy DoS.

https://about.me/paulorenato

​LPIC - 1 | LPIC - 2 | LPIC - 303 Security | LPIC - 300 Mixed Environment
MTCNA | MTCWE | VCA5-DCV | VCP4/5/6-DCV
NSE1 | NSE2 | NSE3
https://about.me/paulorenato​LPIC - 1 | LPIC - 2 | LPIC - 303 Security | LPIC - 300 Mixed EnvironmentMTCNA | MTCWE | VCA5-DCV | VCP4/5/6-DCVNSE1 | NSE2 | NSE3
Edmond
New Contributor

no DoS policy enable

Labels
Top Kudoed Authors