Hi,
I've come across a website that one of our department uses and since our migration to the new firewall, can't access. After a little bit of troubleshooting, I noticed that if I add a specific rule from my internal LAN to the specific website IP as a Destination, then the website is accessible. What I don't understand is that a similar rule/policy is right under it with ALL as destination and yet, the traffic doesn't go through. All other websites(so far), are reachable and I have not gotten any complaints. Why is this website different?
Can anyone explain why the ALL object doesn't seem to work for all? If I am not giving enough information, please let me know.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
Glad this worked out. Another example and story which might be happening. I was working in Africa teh nation country that I was in has AFRICNIC and RIPE address blocks routed-via cogent, any thing source with AFRICNIC going to youtube for example had problems.
RIPE SRC ranges where 100% good. I believe various controls where restricting address by GEOIP information.
PCNSE
NSE
StrongSwan
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1711 | |
1093 | |
752 | |
447 | |
231 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.