Solved! Go to Solution.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
Hi All,
I just fix it by apply this fix and re-install fortigate client.
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=86BDD34D41D3E179!2065&authkey=!AAeyjPB4O4uVxek
You may find the detail from this forums. Hope this could help you all. Thanks.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11682811/anyconnect-msi-installation-failed-windows-7
Hi,
I seem to be experiencing this problem, or very similar problem.
Forticlient hangs at 98% while connecting. But this only happen occasionally -- especially if the connect dropped for some reason and I try to connect again (possibly every time this happens).
I am able to get Forticlient to connect if I reboot my machine. So maybe this is not the identical problem discussed here. Sometimes it gives the "You already have an open SSL VPN connection" warning, but not always. Either way, it stops at 98%, after a minute or so, it just clears the login fields of the forticlient window as if nothing had ever happened.
Rebooting my machine "resets" something and makes connection possible. But this is a frustrating workaround.
Is there a process or service I should be able to restart that would have the same effect as rebooting?
Hi guys,
I have this Windows 8.1 issue; SSL client connects then disconnects after 10s; any hint to make this work?
Server is Fortigate 100D with 5.2.2
Thanks in advance!
The most expensive and scarce resource for man is time, paradoxically, it' s infinite.
I also had encountered that problem many times. My solution for this problem and somehow it always works:
1. Remove SSL VPN client from computer 2. Restart computer 3. Install newest VPN SSL client software
4. Configure new connection 5. Tick "Keep connection alive until manually stopped"
Here is my similar situation and the solution. I did contact technical support and they directed me to the Microsoft forums. I adapted my solution from the link they provided.
FG200B - 5.2.2
Vendor cannot connect to SSL VPN after upgrading from SSLVPN client 4.x to FortiClient 5.x from forticlient.com
I installed the same client to test. Before changing anything my 4.x SSL VPN client worked just fine. After switching to FortiClient 5.x my VPN connection now fails at 98%. I open support ticket and tell support the 5.x client is broken. after a lot of back and forth talk, I downgrade back to my 4.x client with the same failure at 98%. Now I realize it is not a 5.x client issue.
Now that I have resolved this, my theory is that the WAN Miniport adapter (purely software defined in the registry) got corrupted either during the 4.x uninstall, the 5.x install, or the 4.x > 5.x upgrade. [I cannot remember if I upgraded or uninstalled/installed]
my solution is below:
Windows RAS Error 720 - PPP VPN fails or disconnects http://www.paulscomputers...les/article.php?ID=298
FG200D 5.6.5 (HA) - primary [size="1"]FWF50B' s 4.3.x, FG60D's 5.2.x, FG60E's 5.4.x [Did my post help you? Please rate my post.][/size] FAZ-VM 5.6.5 | Fortimail 5.3.11 Network+, Security+
We're working with Microsoft, and will hopefully have a fix soon. Both companies are aware of the issue. Thank you for sharing the WAN Miniport adapter resolution.
Regards, Chris McMullan Fortinet Ottawa
Christopher McMullan_FTNT wrote:We're working with Microsoft, and will hopefully have a fix soon. Both companies are aware of the issue. Thank you for sharing the WAN Miniport adapter resolution.
Christopher,
Your post indicates that this is a known issue and that Fortinet and Microsoft are working on it. Can you please provide an update?
Thank you!
Same Issue here using Windows 7 64X
tried everything that i could fine here and on the web. nothing Helps. it just hangs all the time on 98%... it´s really bad because i do work a lot from home and cannot connect to my customers networks anymore.
No Windows Updates were made and no new installations. it just stoped to work today and i don´t now what else should i try to solve this.
i installed the newest 5.4 with no success either...
NSE 8
NSE 1 - 7
[101:root:324]allocSSLConn:245 sconn 0x2a99c4d000 (0:root)
2016-01-04 11:23:31 [101:root:324]SSL_accept returned 0.
2016-01-04 11:23:31 [101:root:324]Destroy sconn 0x2a99c4d000, connSize=0. (root)
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [102:root:323]allocSSLConn:245 sconn 0x2a99c4d000 (0:root)
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [102:root:323]main.c,epollFdHandler,549, sconn=0x2a99c4d000[24,-1,-1,-1,-1], fd=24, event=25.
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [102:root:323]main.c:606 s: 0x2a99c4d000 event: 0x19
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [102:root:323]Destroy sconn 0x2a99c4d000, connSize=0. (root)
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]allocSSLConn:245 sconn 0x2a99c4d000 (0:root)
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]SSL established: TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_authutil.c:418 no session id in auth info
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_authutil.c:701 invalid cache, ret=4103
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_authutil.c:418 no session id in auth info
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_authutil.c:639 access failed, uri=[/remote/logincheck],ret=4103,
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_logincheck_cb_handler:839 user 'exampler' has a matched local entry.
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]two factor check for exampler: off
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]fam_auth_send_req:514 with server blacklist:
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]SSL VPN login matched rule (1).
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_websession.c:342 decode session id ok, user=[example],group=[ssl_example],portal=[cancomsupport],host=[46.5.16.60],realm=[],idx=0,auth=1,login=1451903013
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_websession.c:342 decode session id ok, user=[exampler],group=[ssl_example],portal=[examplesupportt],host=[46.5.16.60],realm=[],idx=0,auth=1,login=1451903013
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_websession.c:342 decode session id ok, user=[exampler],group=[ssl_example],portal=[examplesupportt],host=[46.5.16.60],realm=[],idx=0,auth=1,login=1451903013
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_websession.c:342 decode session id ok, user= user=[exampler],group=[ssl_example],portal=[examplesupportt],host=[46.5.16.60],realm=[],idx=0,auth=1,login=1451903013
2016-01-04 11:23:33 [104:root:324]rmt_websession.c:342 decode session id ok, user= user=[exampler],group=[ssl_example],portal=[examplesupportt],host=[46.5.16.60],realm=[],idx=0,auth=1,login=1451903013
2016-01-04 11:23:34 [104:root:324]rmt_websession.c:342 decode session id ok, user= user=[exampler],group=[ssl_example],portal=[examplesupportt]host=[46.5.16.60],realm=[],idx=0,auth=1,login=1451903013
2016-01-04 11:23:34 [104:root:324]rmt_websession.c:342 decode session id ok, user= user=[exampler],group=[ssl_example],portal=[examplesupportt]host=[46.5.16.60],realm=[],idx=0,auth=1,login=1451903013
2016-01-04 11:23:34 [104:root:324]rmt_apsession.c:1052 tunnel vd[root] ip[10.212.134.210]
2016-01-04 11:23:34 [106:root:324]allocSSLConn:245 sconn 0x2a99c4d000 (0:root)
2016-01-04 11:23:34 [106:root:324]SSL_accept returned 0.
2016-01-04 11:23:34 [106:root:324]Destroy sconn 0x2a99c4d000, connSize=0. (root
NSE 8
NSE 1 - 7
Hi,
after having encountered the 98% disconnect problem too, I found something that worked for me:
I was charging my mobile over USB, and it provides a modem to Windows. Although the ISDN device is selected for fortissl, and although "repairing" FortiClient and rebooting while the phone was charging, I couldn't connect. After disconnecting the Phone, "repairing" the FortiClient installation and rebooting, I can connect again.
HTH,
McKoene
Has there been any other progress on this?
I have seen some resolutions here and we have been able to perform some of the WAN Miniport fixes, but when it happened to us it was a combination of that and then memory usage.
Holy have you managed any progress on this? We saw very similar debug results with ours.
----
FG 200B/30D/60D/80D/100D/200D/300D
FE 200D
Hello, no progress at the Moment. much troubleshooting and Ticket escalation by fortinet. But no final result yet.
The Customer is very upset at the moment and dissapointed
NSE 8
NSE 1 - 7
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1679 | |
1085 | |
752 | |
446 | |
226 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.