- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Subnet as ZTNA destination
Hi ZTNA admins
Can a subnet be used as ZTNA destination? E.g.: "10.1.1.0/24:443".
Actually EMS and FortiGate accept it as configuration without error, and we can see it propagated on the client as a ZTNA destination, however when I try access a host (e.g.: 10.1.1.20:443) from the client it seems not working.
So am I missing something or is it just not supported?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
FortiClient
-
FortiClient EMS
-
FortiGate
-
ZTNA
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi AEK,
Currently, ZTNA destinations for support options Select IP, IP Range, FQDN, Wildcard FQDN, or CIDR are supported via EMS version 7.2.5.
However, it will be only supported via Forticlient 7.4.1 which is currently not released.
I would suggest waiting for the GA build to check the persistence of the issue.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I don’t think ZTNA subnet is supported. Only host FQDN or IPs is a valid parameter. ZTNA destinations are mapped to a Real server IP in the backend using ZTNA access proxy. It is not possible to use subnets in the ZTNA servers. https://docs.fortinet.com/document/forticlient/7.4.0/administration-guide/403758/ztna-destination
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for your response, Amritpal.
I understand and I find it logical.
In that case I think the user should be warned with an error message when he enters a subnet as destination.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi AEK,
Currently, ZTNA destinations for support options Select IP, IP Range, FQDN, Wildcard FQDN, or CIDR are supported via EMS version 7.2.5.
However, it will be only supported via Forticlient 7.4.1 which is currently not released.
I would suggest waiting for the GA build to check the persistence of the issue.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Anil
Thanks for your response.
So we'll wait for 7.4.1.
