Created on 09-05-2024 02:17 PM Edited on 09-05-2024 02:24 PM
My issue is that if I have 2 dialup tunnels on a remote gate, each dialup is connected to a seperate ISP, if I lose the primary ISP that is connected to dialup tunnel 1 and dialup tunnel 2 (seperate ISP) picks up the routing, then some routes are discovered on the correct dialup interface, but others show as being discovered via the wan interface.
I am not sure what the problem is.
See below:
This is in a test environment. The gates are on 7.2.8
Remote Gate
config vpn ipsec phase1-interface
edit "advpn_1"
set interface "wan1"
set peertype any
set net-device disable
set proposal aes256-sha256
set add-route disable
set auto-discovery-receiver enable
set remote-gw x.x.x.x
next
end
config vpn ipsec phase2-interface
edit "advpn_1_p2"
set phase1name "advpn_1"
set proposal aes256-sha256
set auto-negotiate enable
next
end
config vpn ipsec phase1-interface
edit "advpn_2"
set interface "wan2"
set peertype any
set net-device disable
set proposal aes256-sha256
set add-route disable
set auto-discovery-receiver enable
set remote-gw x.x.x.x
next
end
config vpn ipsec phase2-interface
edit "advpn_2_p2"
set phase1name "advpn_1"
set proposal aes256-sha256
set auto-negotiate enable
next
end
Hub Dialup config
config vpn ipsec phase1-interface
edit "advpn_1"
set type dynamic
set interface "port1"
set peertype any
set net-device disable
set proposal aes256-sha256
set add-route disable
set dpd on-idle
set auto-discovery-sender enable
set auto-discovery-receiver enable
set dpd-retryinterval 60
next
end
config vpn ipsec phase2-interface
edit "advpn_1_p2"
set phase1name "advpn_1"
set proposal aes256-sha256
next
end
config vpn ipsec phase1-interface
edit "advpn_2"
set type dynamic
set interface "port2"
set peertype any
set net-device disable
set proposal aes256-sha256
set add-route disable
set dpd on-idle
set auto-discovery-sender enable
set auto-discovery-receiver enable
set dpd-retryinterval 60
next
end
config vpn ipsec phase2-interface
edit "advpn_2_p2"
set phase1name "advpn_2"
set proposal aes256-sha256
next
end
Thank you for any help.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
Created on 09-05-2024 02:21 PM Edited on 09-05-2024 02:22 PM
Should also mention that remote gate dialup tunnels are in an SDWAN zone, have an SLA and a SDWAN rule based on best quality. Routing works correctly regardless of which dialup is selected by the rule, unless I lose an ISP and one tunnel goes down. Then routing gets all weird.
Hi,
I'm sure this is because your SLA option: update static route is enabled, I have the same problem before, disabled it and problem solved.
Goodluck.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1732 | |
1105 | |
752 | |
447 | |
240 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.