Support Forum
The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts.
ITAbteilung
New Contributor

SSL VPN alternatives unusable

Hi,

so what is the plan going forward with SSL VPN?

There is NO alternative to it for us as we are forced to use Port 443 for incoming connections due to restrictions in hotels.

 

IPSec: **bleep**s its pants when there are multiple connections from the same source ip, specially if there is another connection to a third party gateway involved from the same source.

ZTNA: Uses different Ports to 443 so unusable.

WebVPN: Heap of Trash and does not work at all with locally installed software that needs to communicate with a server.

 

And due to NIS2 (European IT Security Safety Laws) beeing in place now we basically have a 4 month old, 100k$ doorstop with 4 1/2 years support on it left as the fortigate is not updateable.

4 REPLIES 4
AEK
SuperUser
SuperUser

Hi

ZTNA port is customizable. You can use 443 as well.

AEK
AEK
ITAbteilung

ZTNA is not usable due to other restrictions as well. 

We can not force external support companies to install a ztna client provided by and managed by us.

AEK

You are right about this.

For external companies I think your best option is PAM.

AEK
AEK
ITAbteilung

PAM is no solution. Access has to be provided directly from the PC somebody is working at to our servers. VPN is the only solution here unfortunatelly.

Announcements
Check out our Community Chatter Blog! Click here to get involved
Labels
Top Kudoed Authors