hi,
i'll be creating multiple (a lot) SNAT policy in a multi-VDOM FGT which is an "F" series (1000 plus model)
my question, do i enable/allow log "all sessions" or just "security events"?
can my current platform (1000 plus F model) can handle such log?
i just want to prevent any high CPU/memory due to lots of NAT processing/cache.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @johnlloyd_13 ,
Technically, it's hard to cause high CPU/Memory usage issues due to NAT usage.
1) The following doc is talking about possible reasons causing high CPU:
2) The KB is talking about something for conserve mode (Memory usage issue)
Since the 1000F does not have a local disk to store the logs, all logs will be held in memory for a rather short duration of time or until a reboot.
It would be recommended to use a external syslog server or FortiAnalyzer to send the logs to relieve the FGT from any 'stress' .
Created on 02-05-2025 10:53 AM Edited on 02-05-2025 10:54 AM
Not true.
FGT 1001F does have a Local Disk. It should be the same for FGT 1000F.
Version: FortiGate-1001F v7.4.7,build2731,250120 (GA.M)
......
Log hard disk: Available
It should be fine to enable NAT and logs in multiple policies.
Created on 02-05-2025 11:33 AM Edited on 02-05-2025 11:34 AM
as far as I know, only models ending with xxx1 have local storage, maybe on higher models/chassis this rule doesn't apply but in the product matrix 1000F is not listed with storage but rather, Local Storage 960 GB (1001F)
Hi @funkylicious ,
I don't have FGT 1000F in hand to verify and confirm. But it seems you are right.
Yes, it is.
Toshi
(global) # get system status | grep Version
Version: FortiGate-1000F v7.2.7,build1577,240131 (GA.M)
Release Version Information: GA
(global) # get system status | grep disk
Log hard disk: Not available
hi,
i didn't specifically mentioned 1000/1001F, it's a bigger chassis/platform.
to my knowledge "F" models have disk on them.
i just want to know if i can "safely" enable syslog on NAT policy on the VDOMs in a single device. no plan to send to a remote syslog at the moment.
hi,
thanks for the reply!
do you have a fortinet link/tech guide or tip that will confirm this?
Hi @johnlloyd_13 ,
Technically, it's hard to cause high CPU/Memory usage issues due to NAT usage.
1) The following doc is talking about possible reasons causing high CPU:
2) The KB is talking about something for conserve mode (Memory usage issue)
User | Count |
---|---|
2101 | |
1185 | |
770 | |
451 | |
344 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2025 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.