- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Policy based ip sec VPN
Hello,
I have fortios 5.6.2 and I would like to configure tunnel VPN with policy based ipsec but, I don't have a chose between firewall and vpn policy.
find attached my capture.
Thank you for your help.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I've got the same problem. FW 5.6.3, NGFW, central SNAT. I want to use policy based ipsec because i need a lot of nat, so it would be easier to use nat in ipsec policy not in central snat table. Is policy based ipsec obsolete?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
To do policy based VPN the tunnel cannot be created as an interface tunnel. Considering the tunnel is not showing up here I am assuming when you created Phase 1 of the tunnel you didn't unselect the Interface Selection.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You can still NAT an interface based IPSec tunnel (in both directions if needed...), you just need to create an IP pool and use that in the policy handling the IPSec tunnel. This is far easier (to me) than d*cking with the old policy based process.
My two cents
Bob - self proclaimed posting junkie!
See my Fortigate related scripts at: http://fortigate.camerabob.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
And to add , a rt-based vpn has a interface so you can do anything with it like a vlan interface
set a inerface egress SNAT ( over load masquerading )
set a DNAT against it
management allowaccess
etc....
I prefer rt-based over policy-base
Ken
PCNSE
NSE
StrongSwan
