Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
I've got the same problem. FW 5.6.3, NGFW, central SNAT. I want to use policy based ipsec because i need a lot of nat, so it would be easier to use nat in ipsec policy not in central snat table. Is policy based ipsec obsolete?
To do policy based VPN the tunnel cannot be created as an interface tunnel. Considering the tunnel is not showing up here I am assuming when you created Phase 1 of the tunnel you didn't unselect the Interface Selection.
You can still NAT an interface based IPSec tunnel (in both directions if needed...), you just need to create an IP pool and use that in the policy handling the IPSec tunnel. This is far easier (to me) than d*cking with the old policy based process.
My two cents
Bob - self proclaimed posting junkie!
See my Fortigate related scripts at: http://fortigate.camerabob.com
And to add , a rt-based vpn has a interface so you can do anything with it like a vlan interface
set a inerface egress SNAT ( over load masquerading )
set a DNAT against it
management allowaccess
etc....
I prefer rt-based over policy-base
Ken
PCNSE
NSE
StrongSwan
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1713 | |
1093 | |
752 | |
447 | |
231 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.