I have 6 sites, I' ll end up with partially meshed topology, should I design my VPN using policy based or route based?
I currently have two sites on policy based and have come across issues with dual WAN setup on my 110C. I' m asking the above question looking for next steps before I continue to troubleshoot my routing issues with dual WAN.
With route based, I can have partially redundant tunnels... it' s nice to have, but not something I need.
Also, to add a bit of background, while reading about route based, the configuration is what I originally expected. For example, I expected to configure routes manually for each VPN tunnel rather then using inbound NAT on policy based.
Anyways, if it doesn' t matter, so be it, I' ll pick one and run with it. If I' ll have less headache running dual WAN using route based, I' ll switch gears and run with it.
-Richard
FGT110Cx2 HA A-P - 4.2.11
FGT 80C,60B,50B x 3,FWF50B - 4.2.11
FGT50B - 4.3.3
FGT40C x 2 - 4.3.7
FAMS