Hi,
I am configuring NAT64 policy from Sit-tunnel to external IPv4 interface.
The Sit-tunnel established over IPv6 Tunnel through IPSec(V4)VPN.
V6 LANs Reaching each other.
NAT64 at HO workd well for HO ip6 lan.
But not successful for Branch lan
The NAT64 policy i am creating from Sit-Tunnel to IPv4.
My question is the NAT 64 policy from Sit-tunnel to IPv4 interface is authorized?
or Do i need to extend my topology with one more device for NAT64?
I am testing this topology with FG40C and FG60C with FortiOS5.2.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
arul
The diag debug flow filter6 is your best friend ;) It will probably give or shed light into what the issue(s) are.
Ken
PCNSE
NSE
StrongSwan
Hi EMNOC,
Thanks for your kind advice. By this diag debug i found the default NAT64 prefix is not routable, and i externally assigned other NAT64 prefix, and complete my test implementation.
Thanks Lot
arul
1st you can started by detail of the FortiOS version your running?
For NAT64 it should be doable but problems in NAT64 has been id recently and more so than NAT66.
As far as authorized, it should be a supported feature minus the position of possible bugs and issues with regards to NAT64. Do a search here for a few examples of NAT64 issues
e.g
[link]https://forum.fortinet.com/tm.aspx?m=126176[/link]
PCNSE
NSE
StrongSwan
User | Count |
---|---|
2117 | |
1187 | |
770 | |
451 | |
344 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2025 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.