Support Forum
The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts.
marijasmlvc
New Contributor

Issues with IPsec Tunnels After Fortigate Upgrade (200F Cluster)

Hi everyone! :)

 

A couple of days ago, I upgraded a client's Fortigate 200F firewall cluster from 7.0.14 due to recent vulnerabilities. The latest recommended version for this model is 7.4.7, but we opted for 7.2.11 instead because of a known bug in 7.4.7 that prevents HTTPS access to the secondary node.

 

The upgrade itself went smoothly—everything seemed fine, HA was in sync, and all functionalities appeared to be working properly.

 

However, we ran into issues with their IPsec tunnels:

 

The tunnels are up and passing traffic, but most services and subnets are unreachable.

Restarting the tunnels didn’t help.

Downgrading to 7.2.10 didn’t fix the issue either.

Downgrading further to 7.0.17—and everything started working normally again.

Possible Causes?

I suspected this might be related to cipher compatibility between versions, but the tunnel appears to be using the correct ciphers, and I’d expect an issue like that to affect the entire tunnel, not just certain services/subnets. Also, 7.0.14 is not that ancient.

 

One thing I did notice is that the phase-2 selector is configured as a named address group object containing all the subnets. Could that be a problem with these newer versions since I did run into similar issues before when using Named Address Object instead of Subnet for the selector?

 

I didn’t have much time for deeper troubleshooting, so any insights or ideas would be greatly appreciated!

 

Thanks in advance! :)

 

1 REPLY 1
rtanagras
Staff
Staff

hi @marijasmlvc  - since it was working on the old version, it would be a good idea to compare the configuration of 7.0.17 with 7.4.7. there might be changes or missing settings. focus on the ipsec tunnel configuration and any referenced settings to quickly identify any differences.


to troubleshoot further, you can run a debug flow to see why the traffic is being dropped. regarding the named address group, it's possible that some subnets are not included in the object group, which could be causing the drop. you can also check the debug flow to see if the issue is related to the phase 2 selectors or ike debug.

Best,
Ricky
Announcements
Check out our Community Chatter Blog! Click here to get involved
Labels
Top Kudoed Authors