Hello everyone,
Before implementing the following configuration in production I'm testing it out in GNS3 and I'm facing issues with Inter-VLAN routing. I have configured FortiGate to act as router-on-a-stick.
Please, find the attached images for the reference. I believe I'm not missing anything here. Any suggestions would be helpful.
Network Diagram:
Firewall Polices:
VLAN Interface details:
Sniffer Output:
Thank you
IMPORTANT UPDATE:
Hey everyone,
This is important I guess,
I just replaced the new FortiGate running FortiOS 7.2 with ForiOS 6.4.9. And, Inter-VLAN routing is happening now without any problem.
I have same configuration in place like the one that I had earlier.
Is this a bug or anything in 7.2 release? Can the Fortinet staff confirm this please?
Please find my updated screenshots:
PC1 to PC2:
PC2 to PC1:
Thank you
Solved! Go to Solution.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
Hi Chethan,
I tested this on a 7.2 device and it is found to work, so issue should be local to your environment only.
best regards,
Jin
Hi seshuganesh,
It can ping.
Thank you
In this case, is it possible to take packet capture in switch to check what is happening with this traffic?
I believe firewall is forwarding the packets
Created on 05-12-2022 02:44 AM Edited on 05-12-2022 03:00 AM
No, switch is not creating any problem.
I replaced the FortiGate with a router (created sub-interfaces) and now PC1 can ping PC2 and PC2 can ping PC1.
I am sure, I'm not missing anything on FortiGate. Am I?
Thank you.
Hi Ganesh,
I have updated my original post. Kindly, check!
Thank you
hm what is in the addressobjects (vlan 100 adress, vlan 200 address). To reach the whole subnet it has to be a subnet or ip range.
Also do PC1 and PC2 have static route to the "opposite" vla with the FGT as gateway? Or do they have the FGT as default gw? If neither is the case the traffic from client to client in other vlan will never hit the FGT hence it would take the wrong route.
--
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." - Douglas Adams
Hi,
Thank you for responding.
The address objects are subnets not individual IP addresses.
Yes, The PCs are configured with default gateway on each VLAN.
If it were not configured, the device in VLAN 100 would not be able to ping VLAN 200 interface IP and vice versa.
PC1 output:
PC2 Output:
Created on 05-12-2022 02:31 AM Edited on 05-12-2022 02:51 AM
@chethan
Ignore: no out packets in sniffer, so this reply wont help
Hi chetan,
can you get this output:
execute ping-options source 10.0.100.254
execute ping 10.0.200.10
execute ping-options reset
execute ping-options source 10.0.200.254
execute ping 10.0.200.10
Please get both these outputs
Hey sw2090,
I have updated my original post. Kindly, check!
Thank you
hm ok so you can ping the FGT in vlan 200 from the Pc1 in vlan 100 and the FGt in vlan 100 from the PC2 in vlan 200. So that means the routing on the pc is good (if not that wouldn't work) and traffic does hit the fgt with correct vid.
Sounds more like if some kind of isolation is enabled on the vlans somewhere. I never had that on our FGT though. So maybe your L2 Switch is causing this?
--
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." - Douglas Adams
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1732 | |
1106 | |
752 | |
447 | |
240 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.