I'm trying to set up an aggregated site-to-site ipsec tunnel to take advantage of load balancing/redundant WANs. The purpose the the tunnel is to export netflow to a remote collector, using VIPs as the source and destination of the netflow. The problem I'm running into is I cannot define more than one VIP with the same external address (the destination address from the remote end's perspective). Can an aggregated tunnel on one end use just a single end-point on the other end, or do I absolutely need two tunnels on each end? Thanks.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
Did you set different values either on "src-filter" or on "service" for two VIPs with the same "extip"?
No. I want the VIPs to handle the same traffic, just coming from different interfaces.
Physical (sounds odd though) tunnels are separated in IPsec aggregate. But the tunnel interface you use for policy and routing including VIPs is only one on both end. In other words, it works as one single tunnel interface.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1735 | |
1107 | |
752 | |
447 | |
240 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.