Hello
I Have one client using vpn site-to-site with my company, now another customer has appeared in which the network segment is the same as that of the first customer, that is, both have the 10.1.0.0/16 network "Phase 2 Selectors - Remote Address" . How would you handle the ipsec tunnel for this other customer?
Thanks all
Solved! Go to Solution.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
That's not basically a problem of the ipsec tunnel. It is simply overlapping subnets on your FGT. You cannot route the same subnet to two different interfaces.
One can cope this with mappings if both sides have a fortigate and then use the mapped subnet instead of the original ones. There is a kb article on this when you google for "fortigate overlapping subnet".
--
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." - Douglas Adams
That's not basically a problem of the ipsec tunnel. It is simply overlapping subnets on your FGT. You cannot route the same subnet to two different interfaces.
One can cope this with mappings if both sides have a fortigate and then use the mapped subnet instead of the original ones. There is a kb article on this when you google for "fortigate overlapping subnet".
--
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." - Douglas Adams
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1679 | |
1085 | |
752 | |
446 | |
226 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.