Whats the best way to handle non-https/http traffic?
This is a web server, that also offers some other services. Currently.
Gate(VIP pointing to web server) -> MPLS -> GATE -> web server
Atm, I almost feel like I am going to have to split the VIP on our outer gate into two IPs, one for the HTTP (pointing to the fortiweb) and the other bypassing the fortiweb containing the other service.
Gate(HTTP VIP) -> MPLS -> Gate -> Fortiweb(reverse proxy) -> Web server
Gate(SERVICE VIP) -> MPLS -> Gate -> Web server
Is there a better way to handle this? This feels flawed to me.
mtousignant wrote:Hi, What is the problem with that?
Is there a better way to handle this? This feels flawed to me.
A WAF is for proxying HTTP/HTTPS traffic; it has nothing to do with another services/protocol.
Do you concern about how could manage your FortiMail, sql or another non-email traffic for instance?
regards,
regards
/ Abel
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1740 | |
1108 | |
752 | |
447 | |
240 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.