We upgraded our 500D from 5.6.2 to 5.6.3. In Policy&Objects-->ipv4 Policy we lost all our section labels, there is no Column Name for Seq #, and no option that I can find to to Create Section Labels. Is this a bug or is there something we need to turn back on?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
Fortinet removed the section labels:
http://kb.fortinet.com/kb/documentLink.do?externalID=FD40956
NSE 4/5/7
We upgraded yesterday. Today when I started creating new rules, I was glad that our huge list of about 800 policies in many sections on our 1500D does not load 20 seconds any more -- after every return to the general list, and on the fastest browser that I could find for this (Firefox, and this used my computer's CPU power as it turned out). But the sections were all expanded. Strange. I collapsed them all one by one and few minutes later I found that they were expanded again when I went back to the list of policies. What? Then I found that thankfully, there is a right-click on any group that helps collapsing them all but returning to the list, they are all expanded. I thought we would open a ticket for this. Now, from the above link I saw that it has been written like that deliberately! Also, pgup, pgdown and arrows don't work when viewing policies (I guess they started working at one point but now it is gone) so I have to use mouse every time to scroll the huge list. I am sorry, but I don't understand this. Still, collapsing the list every time is still quicker than waiting for the list to load so there is improvement in time in everyday work.
Fortinet removed the section labels:
http://kb.fortinet.com/kb/documentLink.do?externalID=FD40956
NSE 4/5/7
Thank you
This is marked as a know issue.
I've got an answere from the support team.
Issue: There is no option to insert section label Development has made major changes in the back-end of the GUI to fix many GUI related bugs. Unfortunately, option "insert section label" has been removed from FortiOS v5.6.3. Development is aware of that and there is a Feature Request already made to get this feature back. I am afraid nothing much can be done from TAC support point of view, and we do not have an ETA of fix where this is coming back or not.
The bug is list in the release note as known issues (Bug ID 456566)
This issue has been fixed in 5.4.8. You will also see a fix in 5.6.4 and 6.0.
The KB article will be updated to reflect that.
We upgraded yesterday. Today when I started creating new rules, I was glad that our huge list of about 800 policies in many sections on our 1500D does not load 20 seconds any more -- after every return to the general list, and on the fastest browser that I could find for this (Firefox, and this used my computer's CPU power as it turned out). But the sections were all expanded. Strange. I collapsed them all one by one and few minutes later I found that they were expanded again when I went back to the list of policies. What? Then I found that thankfully, there is a right-click on any group that helps collapsing them all but returning to the list, they are all expanded. I thought we would open a ticket for this. Now, from the above link I saw that it has been written like that deliberately! Also, pgup, pgdown and arrows don't work when viewing policies (I guess they started working at one point but now it is gone) so I have to use mouse every time to scroll the huge list. I am sorry, but I don't understand this. Still, collapsing the list every time is still quicker than waiting for the list to load so there is improvement in time in everyday work.
It's a bug (#458586) because it's a temporary performance workaround.
They are supposed to fix it in 5.4.8 (out already) and 5.6.4.
Hello,
I'm planning upgrade my two HA 1500D to 5.6.3 version. I'm at 5.4.4. I will like to hear about your experience with this version since you're using the same FGT models I have.
Do you use deep-inspection? if yes, have you had any problem with this? (bug 450693)
Is SSLVPN tunnel mode working Ok? (if you have it configured) (bug 441068)
Have you packets drops due it to NPU offload? (bug 436746)
What is your overall experience with this version? is it woth ?
Sorry to botehr you with so many questions, but I'm trying to have enough information before to planify the upgrade, and there's a lot of bug in all this versions.
Thanks in advance,
Laura
HI
Kindly advise me best practices to upgrade fortiOS 5.4.3 to 5.4.4 in HA active passive mode.
i have given 20 minutes of time for MW..
Do I need to break HA and upgrade one by one
or any confg alteration to be done to move traffic to secondary ?
thanks in advance !
Fortiboy
@fortiboy: why bother to hijack a thread? Opening one yourself is free on these forums...
Anyway, no, you don't need to do anything of what you suggested.
First, get the backup of both the master and (!) the slave unit - a management port is helpful.
Second, disable HA port monitoring if used. Re-enable ten minutes after the upgrade when everything has settled.
Then, in the WebGUI, start the upgrade. First, the slave will be upgraded, then the cluster fails over and the master is upgraded. Depending on your HA settings, the cluster will fail over again.
To obtain the shortest possible interruption (in the range of a few seconds) set the HA parameter 'HA priority' equal, and do not enable 'HA override'.
Finally, I would not upgrade to v5.4.4 because v5.4.10 is already published. That is, many bug fixes are available beyond v5.4.4.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1641 | |
1069 | |
751 | |
443 | |
210 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.