FortiManager and partially shadowed policies

[ZafirFX]

Hi guys,

In our FMG I'm using policy package consistency check to check for inconsistency's withn our policies.

As for now I have troubles with one polcy where I'm getting errour about partially shadowed policies

So what did I do:

Because we wanted to block FTP and ICMP from Subnet 1 to two different hosts in our MGMT I created a rule where I'm blocking both services to those hosts...

The rules looks like this at the moment:

config firewall policy
edit 1
set srcintf "LAN"
set dstintf "MGMT"
set srcaddr "SUBNET1"
set dstaddr "IP3" "IP4"
set schedule "always"
set service "FTP""ICMP"
set logtraffic disable
set action deny
next
end

config firewall policy
edit 2
set srcintf "LAN"
set dstintf "MGMT"
set srcaddr "SUBNET1"
set dstaddr "all"
set schedule "always"
set service "ALL"
set logtraffic all
set action accept
next
end

Now every time I do a policy check I get an error that policy 2 is partially shadowed by rule 1

Something I don't understand.... In my first rule I'm using two host with action deny for two services while the second one allowes the all other traffic.

I know that I can disable the policy check but is there way to get around this? 

Why does the FMG doesn't see that the first rule is an deny rule with two different hosts and services?

In my eyes every deny statement on top of the policy wil create partially shadowed policies.

[Toshi_Esumi]

What version of FMG? I found this with 6.4.6 when we first deployed FMG. And opened a ticket at TAC to complain about it. But as always, ended up "you need to file an NFR(new feature request) via SE". I haven't tried re-enabling automatic policy check since then.

Toshi

[ZafirFX]

At the moment I'm on 7.0.4

[Toshi_Esumi]

That's the very latest of 7.0.x. You generally need to open a TAC ticket to file an NFR and attach the ticket number when you contact an SE. Or if you're lucky, you might be able to get a bug ID from TAC if they've gotten enough complaints and recognized necessity of changing the design.

Toshi

[Israel]

If I understood it correctly, this message appears because you are blocking traffic that could be authorized by policy 2, I would not consider it an error.

[Toshi_Esumi]

Detecting it as "partially shadows" is fine, although that's very normal way of building up policies. But the biggest problem is the policy check fails because of this and we can't install the policy package. That's the problem.

Toshi