Hi all,
We need dual access to a subnet: LAN (MPLS) and IPSEC VPN (Fortigate v6.0.7)
If LAN (MPLS) fail, IPSEC VPN get UP as fail-over.
Example in route:
S 192.168.1.0/24 [10/0] via 10.10.10.5, LAN (MPLS)
[10/0] is directly connected, VPNtunnel (IpsecVPN), [50/0]
Exmple Link_monitor:
config system link-monitor
edit "Monitor_subnet_1"
set srcintf "LAN"
set server "192.168.1.x"
set gateway-ip 10.10.10.5
set source-ip 10.x.x.x
set update-cascade-interface disable
next
That work fine, but when we add another subnet:
S 192.168.44.0/24 [10/0] via 10.10.10.5, LAN (MPLS)
[10/0] is directly connected, VPNtunnel (IpsecVPN), [50/0]
edit "Monitor_subnet_44"
set srcintf "LAN" *****
set server "192.168.44.x"
set gateway-ip 10.10.10.5
set source-ip 10.x.x.x
set update-cascade-interface disable
next
Get this error:
"Gateway is not unique for the same interface.
object set operator error, -7 discard the setting
Command fail. Return code -7"
That's a limitation, which are link-monitor alternatives? Or how we can fix this?
Any help will be apreciated
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
You didn't provide enough info to get those those destinations after leaving LAN interface. Of course SD-WAN would work but a lot more would be involved, including removing all configuration, which is referring "LAN" and "VPNtunnel" and re-configuring them from scratch with like "SD-WAN", then set up proper rules. To me routing protocol like BGP is easier.
One link monitor to one outgoing interface takes all static routes down toward the interface when it lost reachability. You don't need the second one.
If you want to fail over per a destination prefix, you need to use one of routing protocols.
Ok, thanks for reply. Implement dynamic routing protocol require a lot of modification in the path. Quick exit is needed..., so : SD WAN it is not possible in this scenario?
There is not in fortigate like ip-sla or nqa?
Thanks again
You didn't provide enough info to get those those destinations after leaving LAN interface. Of course SD-WAN would work but a lot more would be involved, including removing all configuration, which is referring "LAN" and "VPNtunnel" and re-configuring them from scratch with like "SD-WAN", then set up proper rules. To me routing protocol like BGP is easier.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1720 | |
1095 | |
752 | |
447 | |
234 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.