Support Forum
The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts.
saim
New Contributor

FQDN address is not working

Hi, I have fortigate 1000A I am using version v4.0,build0521,120313 (MR3 Patch 6). I have added in address imap.gmail.com but its not working. I have checked everything is fine as I give IP address it works. any idea.
Saim.... FortiGate 1000A (v4.0,build0535,120511 (MR3 Patch 7)) FortiAnalyzer-800B (v4.0,build0654 (MR3 Patch 3))
Saim.... FortiGate 1000A (v4.0,build0535,120511 (MR3 Patch 7)) FortiAnalyzer-800B (v4.0,build0654 (MR3 Patch 3))
32 REPLIES 32
mEjdejBDG
New Contributor

After nslookup on this server, I get ' DNS request timed out' When I added in Windows hosts file, IP nad name of google maps it works in the browser, but it seems weird. There' s no map etc.. I' ve changed policy to ALL in destination, and it works :| I have no idea what' s wrong
ede_pfau

just to clarify: if you put one single object into the policy, it works. Which kind of object then, FQDN or IP?
Ede Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
Ede Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
FlavioB
New Contributor III

Hallo Ede. Yes, if I put a single FQDN-based Firewall Object in the source of the policy, it works. F.
mEjdejBDG

Hi, It doesn' t work for me... I' ve put address object in group, I' ve changed names of addresses to single-word. Nothing works.
FlavioB
New Contributor III

Hy. That' s really quite strange. I managed to put all the FQDN objects (which have spaces in their names too!) into a group (which too has spaces in its name). I re-created a policy with that group and it works! MR3 Patch7 Regards, F.
RindlisE

Hi mEjdejBDG After lots of tests try this as a Workaround: 1. Use a dedicated Policy with Address Obects (IP/Subnet). 2. Use a second Policy with FQDN Objects. Do not mix different types of Objects (FQDN, IP/Subnet..). Keep in mind, this is only a Workaround. Hope Fortinet will fix this bug soon... Regards Erich
FlavioB
New Contributor III

Hy. Actually Fortinet knows that it is a bug. Don' t know when it' ll be solved though... F.
Phuoc_Ngo

Anyone know whether this issue get resolve in MR3 patch7? This issue seem to impact us big time.
FlavioB
New Contributor III

The problem is not solved in v4p3mr7, as we have that version on the " faulty" device config. It has been recognised as a bug, actually. Regards, F.
RindlisE
New Contributor

Hi, Try to use this Workaround. create a Group Object and put your Address Object in this Group. Use the Group Object in your Rule. Regards Erich
Announcements

Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!

Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.

Labels
Top Kudoed Authors