Hi,
Anyone out there using FortiOS v7.4.4,build2662 on the FortiGate-60F? How is your RAM usage?
I've installed v7.4.4,build2662 a couple of weeks ago, and the device was entering conserve mode every few days or so. Usual RAM utilization was around 75%, right after boot, so no wonder it was pushing it into conserve mode.
I've since downgraded to 7.2 (now usual RAM usage i 60-65%) but with this version we're having other issues which I would love to resolve (long connection times, need to refresh a web page a few times to open it etc...).
Here is the info I got during the last conserve mode:
firewall01 get system status
Version: FortiGate-60F v7.4.4,build2662,240514 (GA.F)
First GA patch build date: 230509
Security Level: 2
Firmware Signature: certified
Virus-DB: 92.05717(2024-07-10 07:26)
Extended DB: 92.05717(2024-07-10 07:25)
AV AI/ML Model: 2.17065(2024-07-10 07:45)
IPS-DB: 28.00824(2024-07-10 00:15)
IPS-ETDB: 0.00000(2001-01-01 00:00)
APP-DB: 28.00823(2024-07-08 23:57)
FMWP-DB: 24.00070(2024-07-05 17:45)
IPS Malicious URL Database: 5.00107(2024-07-10 08:52)
IoT-Detect: 28.00824(2024-07-09 17:07)
OT-Detect-DB: 28.00824(2024-07-09 17:07)
OT-Patch-DB: 28.00824(2024-07-09 17:11)
OT-Threat-DB: 28.00823(2024-07-08 23:57)
IPS-Engine: 7.00539(2024-05-09 00:27)
Serial-Number: FGT60F*********
BIOS version: 05000030
System Part-Number: P24286-07
Log hard disk: Not available
Hostname: firewall01
Private Encryption: Disable
Operation Mode: NAT
Current virtual domain: root
Max number of virtual domains: 10
Virtual domains status: 1 in NAT mode, 0 in TP mode
Virtual domain configuration: disable
FIPS-CC mode: disable
Current HA mode: standalone
Branch point: 2662
Release Version Information: GA
System time: Wed Jul 10 18:32:42 2024
Last reboot reason: warm reboot
firewall01 diag sys top
[H[JRun Time: 0 days, 22 hours and 34 minutes
12U, 0N, 0S, 85I, 3WA, 0HI, 0SI, 0ST; 1917T, 301F
ipshelper 186 R < 99.9 9.0 6
quard 208 S 2.9 0.8 4
snmpd 197 S 0.4 0.6 0
node 169 S 0.0 4.1 6
ipsengine 346 S < 0.0 3.3 5
ipsengine 347 D < 0.0 3.3 7
ipsengine 348 S < 0.0 3.1 6
wad 298 S 0.0 2.6 2
forticron 174 S 0.0 2.3 2
wad 300 S 0.0 2.1 6
cmdbsvr 132 S 0.0 2.1 0
miglogd 183 S 0.0 2.0 0
cw_acd 221 S 0.0 1.8 1
forticron 3677 S 0.0 1.6 2
wad 190 S 0.0 1.5 5
forticron 3678 R 0.0 1.5 3
forticron 3676 S 0.0 1.5 4
sslvpnd 187 S 0.0 1.4 3
csfd 228 S 0.0 1.3 5
scanunitd 3645 S < 0.0 1.2 2
[H[JRun Time: 0 days, 22 hours and 34 minutes
2U, 0N, 1S, 73I, 24WA, 0HI, 0SI, 0ST; 1917T, 304F
ipshelper 186 D < 11.7 7.0 1
iked 192 S 2.9 0.9 4
ipsengine 348 S < 1.9 3.7 6
ipsengine 346 S < 1.3 3.8 5
ipsengine 347 S < 1.3 3.8 7
miglogd 306 S 0.3 1.3 0
urlfilter 290 S < 0.3 0.8 1
radvd 213 S 0.3 0.6 2
forticron 3678 R 0.1 1.5 3
sslvpnd 235 S 0.1 1.1 3
sslvpnd 236 S 0.1 1.1 1
authd 176 S 0.1 0.7 1
syslogd 194 S 0.1 0.7 1
dnsproxy 215 S 0.1 0.5 1
acd 200 S 0.1 0.4 7
merged_daemons 172 S 0.1 0.4 2
node 169 S 0.0 4.1 6
wad 298 S 0.0 2.6 2
forticron 174 S 0.0 2.3 2
wad 300 S 0.0 2.1 2
[H[JRun Time: 0 days, 22 hours and 34 minutes
10U, 0N, 0S, 87I, 3WA, 0HI, 0SI, 0ST; 1917T, 316F
ipshelper 186 R < 83.1 7.4 1
forticron 174 S 0.7 2.3 3
ipsengine 346 S < 0.5 3.9 5
ipsengine 347 S < 0.5 3.8 7
ipsengine 348 S < 0.1 3.8 6
cw_acd 221 S 0.1 1.8 0
sslvpnd 238 S 0.1 1.1 7
node 169 S 0.0 4.1 6
wad 298 S 0.0 2.6 2
wad 300 S 0.0 2.1 0
cmdbsvr 132 S 0.0 2.1 0
miglogd 183 S 0.0 2.1 5
forticron 3677 S 0.0 1.6 2
wad 190 S 0.0 1.5 6
forticron 3678 R 0.0 1.5 3
forticron 3676 S 0.0 1.5 4
sslvpnd 187 S 0.0 1.4 5
miglogd 306 S 0.0 1.3 2
csfd 228 S 0.0 1.3 5
scanunitd 3645 S < 0.0 1.2 2
[H[JRun Time: 0 days, 22 hours and 34 minutes
11U, 0N, 0S, 86I, 3WA, 0HI, 0SI, 0ST; 1917T, 330F
ipshelper 186 R < 94.8 7.4 2
ipsengine 348 D < 1.1 3.9 6
cw_acd 221 S 0.1 1.8 3
forticron 3678 R 0.1 1.5 3
sslvpnd 235 S 0.1 1.1 4
snmpd 197 S 0.1 0.6 3
node 169 S 0.0 4.1 7
ipsengine 346 S < 0.0 3.9 5
ipsengine 347 S < 0.0 3.8 7
wad 298 S 0.0 2.6 5
forticron 174 S 0.0 2.3 3
wad 300 S 0.0 2.1 5
miglogd 183 S 0.0 2.1 0
cmdbsvr 132 S 0.0 2.1 0
forticron 3677 S 0.0 1.6 2
wad 190 S 0.0 1.5 6
forticron 3676 S 0.0 1.5 4
sslvpnd 187 S 0.0 1.4 5
miglogd 306 S 0.0 1.3 3
csfd 228 S 0.0 1.3 6
NSE 7
All oppinions/statements written here are my own.
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
The blue line is the monitoring of RAM usage of my forti 61F.
I recently upgrade from 6.4.last to 7.4.last.... guess when ?
(about 15% more !!!)
The scariest part about this picture is the obvious trend of increasing RAM usage... :D
NSE 7
All oppinions/statements written here are my own.
Hello Everyone,
Have you tried this workaround:
https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-FortiGate-is-entering-into-Conserve-Mode-d...
Created on 10-16-2024 04:05 PM Edited on 10-16-2024 04:06 PM
It still hits conserve mode even on the mini database and with acceleration disabled.
We're also seeing other issues with 7.4.5 crop up now. Fortiguard at times will fail to update because it detects a self signed certificate in the chain of the factory hardware cert (which is properly registered to the serial number), showing spinning circles for the status of various Fortiguard licensed services, then suddenly it'll stop yelling about the cert, the status of the features will show normally, and updates will run.
We're also seeing spoke devices just randomly lose their BGP routes from the hubs. BGP will still be established, there's no errors logged, but the routes are just gone. Routes to other sites through the hub are still present and working, but the hub's local network routes just drop until we either reboot the spoke or forcefully rebuild BGP.
This is on top of the finally acknowledged IPSEC memory leak.
I just finished downgrade testing for 7.2.10. I doubt we'll entertain the idea of any 7.4 release anytime soon. I've never seen a product this badly broken this far into the release cycle, and I work for a Microsoft Partner...
Fortunately, I don't have BGP on my home firewall, but we do use it in the company, so another thing to consider.
My ticket @FotiSupport was escalated to senior Support on Monday, but I haven't heard back from them yet. Not even the statement, “The finally acknowledged IPSEC memory leak”.
I will wait some time for them and decide what to do.
@dbhavsar
Of these measures, I scheduled the FortiGuard update at 2 a.m. every day. At least this way we don't have the Conserve mode during the day. I have to check every morning if it has been recovered. I hope it will be fixed soon, otherwise I will go back to 7.2.
I have given up :(
Last Saturday I went back to 7.2.10 on my home firewall. Conserve Mode was usually set to 2-3 AM, due to scheduled FortiGuard updates, but I had also experienced that the WiFi (FortiAP) was not accepting new clients. After rebooting the firewall, it worked again. This was the final push to a rollback
Same issue here on a big chunk of FGT40F and FGT60F's that we are running.
I've tried a few of the memory tricks:
IPS engine-worker 2
automation stitch to restart WAD once everyday
And disabling Security Rating.
For some gates this seems to work, other not. So far the issue is happening after work hours, so users are not affected, but I would like to remove the problem all together.
I do have open ticket with Fortinet, and I hope this gets a better fix in place soon.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1720 | |
1093 | |
752 | |
447 | |
234 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.