Hello,
We have configured 1-to-1 NAT, but there are a few ports we would still like to block. Would I be correct in that the process for doing this would be:
[ol]
Thanks, in advance, for your insight!
Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply.
Why do you need No.2? You just want only the rest of ports access to follow the current out-to-in (or in-to-out) NAT rule, right? You can simply deny traffic coming in for those specific ports with No.3.
The vip is one part the access rule controls the traffic, can you share what you did since you mention 1-to-1 nat and then port-forward in the same breath so it's confusing what you actually did.
Also keep in mind that fwpolicy ordering of the sequence plays a very very important factor in matching the NAT.
Ken Felix
PCNSE
NSE
StrongSwan
Yea, you probably need it. Without the vip, FGT can't determine the outgoing port.
Select Forum Responses to become Knowledge Articles!
Select the “Nominate to Knowledge Base” button to recommend a forum post to become a knowledge article.
User | Count |
---|---|
1692 | |
1087 | |
752 | |
446 | |
228 |
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.