Skip to main content
Flyshuffle
New Member
November 14, 2014
Solved

This FortiManager does not support the discovered device model and firmware version combin

  • November 14, 2014
  • 13 replies
  • 37668 views

Hello Everyone,

 

I just spun up a new installation of FortiManager, version 5.2 build 618. I am using the virtual appliance downloaded from the website. I am trying to import a couple of FortiGate 300D devices, version 5.2.1 build 618. However, I get the following error: This FortiManager does not support the discovered device model and firmware version combination. 

 

Has anyone seen that problem before? Could anyone provide a fix or workaround?

 

Thanks!

Best answer by Matthew_Mollenhauer

You're in same boat we are, it looks like all "D" models that are based on the NP6 asic are not supported yet.

 

13 replies

Viper
New Member
November 14, 2014

Looks like you need to wait for Fortimanager 5.2.1. We are having the same problem and was told that 5.2.1 would be released soon.. That was over three weeks ago. This is becoming unacceptable. We were assured that upgrading our FW to 5.2.1 would be supported by Fortimanager. 

Matthew_Mollenhauer
New Member
November 16, 2014

You're in same boat we are, it looks like all "D" models that are based on the NP6 asic are not supported yet.

 

Flyshuffle
New Member
December 15, 2014

Looks like FortiManager 5.2.1 was recently released. The release notes do say that FG200D and FG300D models are now supported. Anyone take it for a spin yet?

Viper
New Member
December 15, 2014

Yeah.. We upgrade to Fortimanager 5.2.1 today and it's able to see our Fortigate 1500D firewall running 5.2.1 without an issue.. 

Matthew_Mollenhauer
New Member
December 15, 2014

There be dragons here!!!!

 

I have just finished upgrading our 1500D DR cluster from 5.0.9 to 5.2.1 using the FortiManager, and there are major issues....

 

As 5.2.x uses UUID's on most objects the FGT will assign UUID's during the upgrade, no major issue yet. But as soon as you go to do a config install the FortiManager will delete all policies that have a UUID that does not match what it think it should be.

 

Of ~550 policies in our DR vdom the FMG was wanting to delete over 400...

 

This reeks of poor testing and no QA....

 

Regards,

Matthew

 

Flyshuffle
New Member
December 16, 2014

Matthew Mollenhauer wrote:

There be dragons here!!!!

 

I have just finished upgrading our 1500D DR cluster from 5.0.9 to 5.2.1 using the FortiManager, and there are major issues....

 

As 5.2.x uses UUID's on most objects the FGT will assign UUID's during the upgrade, no major issue yet. But as soon as you go to do a config install the FortiManager will delete all policies that have a UUID that does not match what it think it should be.

 

Of ~550 policies in our DR vdom the FMG was wanting to delete over 400...

 

This reeks of poor testing and no QA....

 

Regards,

Matthew

 

I decided to do the upgrade, and I had a similar thing happen. Everything appeared to work just find during the upgrade. However, the next day I had a teammate notice they lost connection to a server sometime after the upgrade. I looked in Fortimanager, everything looked fine. I logged directly into the firewall in read only mode, and noticed the policy was different than what was in FM, maybe only 1/2 the rules were there. Went back to FM, and it said the policy, device, etc. is all synced and happy. I re-installed the policy, FM says it was successful, but back on the firewall itself, only about 1/2 the policy was there.

 

Thankfully, that one server was the only production system being protected by the Fortinet firewall, and it was easy to move the server to our old firewall to get it running again. But it looks like I will have to wait for yet another update before I think about putting these new Fortigates and Fortimanger into production.

 

Thanks for the feedback everyone.

scao_FTNT
Staff
Staff
December 15, 2014

Hi, Matthew,

 

So you are doing a policy package install to that device? and policy package has all policies (~550 policies) for that device?

 

you may need to open a ticket and provide us more config details

 

Thanks

 

Simon

Matthew_Mollenhauer
New Member
December 15, 2014

I'm planning to open a ticket, contributing to the Fortinet bug tracker is my favorite pastime.

 

The fact that I've found at least one significant bug in each FMG release within a week of it being released (since 5.0.2) speaks volumes for the QA department at Fortinet...

 

Regards,

Matthew

 

scao_FTNT
Staff
Staff
December 15, 2014

Hi, Matthew,

 

After you open a ticket, pls give me the ticket ID and I will follow up your case

 

Thanks

 

Simon

scao_FTNT
Staff
Staff
December 16, 2014

Hi, Flyshuffle

 

For previous Matthew's case, that case is for install FMG 5.0 ADOM policy package to 5.2 FGT and because FOS 5.2 re-designed policy (for example, 1 policy with multiple identity rule will become multiple policies after upgrade to 5.2), so FMG re-organized policy with new policy ID, and triggered policy delete and re-install

 

Not sure if this is similar case as your FMG/FGT env? and not sure if you can send me the FMG install log for further investigation?

 

Thanks

Simon

Matthew_Mollenhauer
New Member
December 17, 2014

scao_FTNT wrote:

Hi, Flyshuffle

 

For previous Matthew's case, that case is for install FMG 5.0 ADOM policy package to 5.2 FGT and because FOS 5.2 re-designed policy (for example, 1 policy with multiple identity rule will become multiple policies after upgrade to 5.2), so FMG re-organized policy with new policy ID, and triggered policy delete and re-install

 

Not sure if this is similar case as your FMG/FGT env? and not sure if you can send me the FMG install log for further investigation?

 

Thanks

Simon

Simon,

 

That's not actually true in my case, the vdom I reported the issue with has not identity based policies.

 

The cause that I can see is the new UUID's introduced in 5.2.0. During the upgrade the Fortigate is generating UUID's for it's policies and then when the FortiManager goes to do an install the UUID's that it (FMG) has don't match. This results in the FMG deleting policies that have the mismatch (in the case I raised it happens to delete all policies) and then installs what it thinks are correct policies.

 

In the brief testing I did on our Backoffice vdom on the same unit, which has only 56 policies, the initial install tried to delete about half the policies and then it was only able to install a couple of the deleted policies, eg; 56->26->32.

 

Subsequent installs resulted in the Fortigate only having 26 policies. As this vdom is only responsible for a couple of Backoffice DMZ services I decided to delete all policies from the Fortigate and then allow the FortiManager to install it's policies. This returned all 56 policies.

 

Simon, as I said in the TAC case

If I was to have performed an install on our Fortigate without first checking what was going to happen our entire DR site would have gone offline, consider now a customer that doesn't test these things as rigorously and they will take down their production environment.
This is exactly what happened to Flyshuffle...

 

Regards,

Matthew

scao_FTNT
Staff
Staff
December 17, 2014

Hi, Matthew,

 

Thanks for the update, yes, your issue is tracked in that ticket and you already provided many details in the ticket.

 

I just want to confirm with Flyshuffle if his case is also for 5.0 package install to 5.2 FGT

 

Thanks

 

Simon