Skip to main content
Explorer
May 18, 2026
Question

OSPF still forming adjacency over VDOM link when one VDOM is disabled?

  • May 18, 2026
  • 2 replies
  • 80 views

Hi,

I’m facing a behavior that seems counter‑intuitive regarding OSPF over inter‑VDOM links.

 

I am in a multi‑VDOM setup:

  • OSPF is configured between VDOMs over a VDOM link
  • Each VDOM has its own routing instance (OSPF process)

 

According to documentation:

  • Inter‑VDOM routing relies on VDOM link interfaces
  • A disabled VDOM does not process traffic (no policy lookup / no forwarding)

 

I encountered the following situation:

  • One of the VDOMs was administratively disabled
  • However:
    • OSPF adjacency was still UP
    • Routes were still being exchanged

 

My understanding was:

  • A disabled VDOM should not process traffic
  • Therefore:
    • No OSPF Hello packets
    • No adjacency

But this does not match the observed behavior.

 

Is this behavior expected?

 

More specifically:

  • Does a disabled VDOM still run routing protocols (OSPF control plane)?
  • Is it possible that:
    • control plane (OSPF) still runs
    • while dataplane (forwarding) is stopped?

Or:

  • Is this a known limitation / bug / specific behavior with VDOM links?

 

Thanks in advance

 

BW

2 replies

Toshi_Esumi
SuperUser
SuperUser
May 18, 2026

How exactly did you “administratively disabled” a VDOM? I don’t think it’s possible. Only way I know is removing “network” statement in OSPF config or shutting down the VDOM links on the VDOM side, which you want to remove from the OSPF topology.

Any routing, static, BGP, OSPF, etc. don’t rely on policies because the protocol packets are “local in/local out” traffic. Removing policies won’t stop those local in/out traffic.

Toshi

B-WAuthor
Explorer
May 18, 2026

I disable the VDOM through the VDOM Global  > System Virtual Domain and put the VDOM in disable.

Toshi_Esumi
SuperUser
SuperUser
May 18, 2026

Is that 7.6 or 8.0’s new feature? I don’t have it with 7.4.12.
 


Toshi

BillH_FTNT
Staff
Staff
May 18, 2026

Hi ​@B-W 

What is your software/hardware version? It would be a great help if you could share the configuration used on your device. I will test the same configuration in my lab. It is easier to reproduce the issue if we have an identical configuration. Thank you.

BIll