Skip to main content
mbrowndcm
New Member
July 1, 2011
Question

no suitable ISAKMP SA?

  • July 1, 2011
  • 0 replies
  • 4824 views
Hello, I' m in the midst of trying to establish a VPN tunnel with a partner. They have a Checkpoint. We are having some issues establishing passed phase 1, and I am receiving no suitable ISAKMP SA when debugging
  ThisSiteFortigate~ (root) # diag debug app ike -1  ThisSiteFortigate~ (root) # diag sniffer packet any ' host 192.168.2.10'   interfaces=[any]  filters=[host 192.168.2.10]  2011-06-21 22:50:52 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:VPN_to_partner_p2: IPsec SA connect 9 192.168.1.1->192.168.2.10:500, natt_mode=0  2011-06-21 22:50:52 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1: found phase2 VPN_to_partner_p2  2011-06-21 22:50:52 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1: created connection: 0x1b21c58 9 192.168.1.1->192.168.2.10:500.  2011-06-21 22:50:52 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1: new connection.  2011-06-21 22:50:52 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1: IPsec SA connect 9 192.168.1.1->192.168.2.10:500 negotiating  2011-06-21 22:50:52 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1: no suitable ISAKMP SA, queuing quick-mode request and initiating ISAKMP SA negotiation  2011-06-21 22:50:52 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:2: initiator: main mode is sending 1st message...  2011-06-21 22:50:52 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:2: cookie 998befcb2be6a7a9/0000000000000000  2011-06-21 22:50:52 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:2: sent IKE msg (ident_i1send): 192.168.1.1:500->192.168.2.10:500, len=228  43.584426 192.168.1.1.500 -> 192.168.2.10.500: udp 228  43.607619 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  43.607733 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  2011-06-21 22:50:54 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:2: sent IKE msg (P1_RETRANSMIT): 192.168.1.1:500->192.168.2.10:500, len=228  45.570016 192.168.1.1.500 -> 192.168.2.10.500: udp 228  45.622288 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  45.622378 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  2011-06-21 22:50:55 ike shrank heap by 118784 bytes  47.632361 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  47.632442 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  2011-06-21 22:50:58 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:2: sent IKE msg (P1_RETRANSMIT): 192.168.1.1:500->192.168.2.10:500, len=228  49.570815 192.168.1.1.500 -> 192.168.2.10.500: udp 228  49.642318 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  49.642416 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  51.652417 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  51.652527 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  53.662373 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  53.662487 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  55.672376 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  55.672468 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  2011-06-21 22:51:06 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:2: sent IKE msg (P1_RETRANSMIT): 192.168.1.1:500->192.168.2.10:500, len=228  57.570033 192.168.1.1.500 -> 192.168.2.10.500: udp 228  59.682404 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  59.682513 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  63.692446 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  63.692606 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  67.702485 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  67.702583 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  71.712447 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  71.712552 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  2011-06-21 22:51:22 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:2: sent IKE msg (P1_RETRANSMIT): 192.168.1.1:500->192.168.2.10:500, len=228  73.570072 192.168.1.1.500 -> 192.168.2.10.500: udp 228  75.722507 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  75.722619 192.168.2.10.500 -> 192.168.1.1.500: udp 88  2011-06-21 22:51:54 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:2: 998befcb2be6a7a9/0000000000000000 negotiation of IKE SA failed due to retry timeout  2011-06-21 22:51:54 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1:2: expiring IKE SA 998befcb2be6a7a9/0000000000000000  2011-06-21 22:51:54 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1: deleting  2011-06-21 22:51:54 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1: flushing  2011-06-21 22:51:54 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1: flushed  2011-06-21 22:51:54 ike 0:VPN_to_partner_p1: deleted  2011-06-21 22:52:04 ike shrank heap by 126976 bytes  
Any ideas on what the problem is? I have reconfirmed all of the the configuration items (keylife, DH group, PFS, PSK). The only thing was confusion about the quickmode selector. In Checkpoint, the same thing is called encryption domains. Both are ACCEPT type ACLs that allow traffic to traverse the tunnels. I want to make sure this would cause a problem with the Phase 1, specifically because it' s a phase 2 attribute. Thanks! Matt