Is this a bad design choice.
I have been running Full UTP on a ha pair of 40F for my family main goal was fitler kids vlan. small device had to cut back on some stuff but was still able to do the filtering. I just bought a pair of 100F, and I wanted to ask if this is dumb thought.
Comparing the UTP vs just Forticare the two things I see I would miss that my 2 years of logs show I use is DNS filtering and web filtering. However 99.9% of my web filter hits are on my kids vlan. For my VLAN to VLAN routing and ACL I had a pair of mikrotik routers.
My plan was to replace the routers with the two 100F buy forticare run SSL decrypt and APP control at that level. Then keep UTP on the 40F but then only decrypt on my kids vlan and only run web filtering and dns filtering on just that vlan. I don't think DNS filtering is a heavy hitter. I am honestly a bit confused why app control can't do it all I see the same categories in app control and as I understand app control is before web filter in the policy chain.
I have a dedicated account i put money in every pay day to pay my annual license cost it would be just slightly less then I needed to buy two 100F UTP so I guess I could cut else where and spend there. But given I have been able to get what I need for the most part with the 40F I thought this might be a good middle ground to split resources usage up.
