Skip to main content
Bitman
New Member
March 3, 2020
Question

FSSO strange behavior

  • March 3, 2020
  • 1 reply
  • 3024 views

We are using FSSO and AD groups to manage authentication and access. Device is Fortigate 80E v6.07. We noticed a strange behavior and I would like to know if this is normal behavior or not. Let's say I have the following setup:

[ul]
  • 2 IPv4 policies:[ul]
  • www (regular internet access)
  • www-Restricted ( restricted internet access).[/ul]
  • An AD group called "LimitedNetAccess" is defined as a source in the www-restricted policy.
  • I have user A and user B, both members of LimitedNetAccess.
  • A workstation on the plant floor on which a windows session is opened as user A.[/ul]

    Scenario: User B uses the workstation to start a remote desktop session to his own remote computer (from inside user A session). He provides his credentials to the rdp session then closes it after he's done. What I see in the webfilter logs :(

    [ul]
  •  First I see entries where the source = UserA (ip_address) ; Policy = www-Restricted
  •  then it changes to source =  UserB (ip_address) ; Policy = www-Restricted
  •  then it change to (ip_address) ; Policy www[/ul]

    It stays like this for many hours in a row, meaning userA now has regular internet access. If we lock/unlock the workstation using userA credentials, then things go back to normal.

     

    Is this a bug ? At least, I would expect that it returns to userA without having to lock the PC...

    • 1 reply

      Alivo__FTNT
      Staff
      Staff
      March 6, 2020

      Hello,

       

      It won't return to user A as there is nothing that should trigger such action. Collector Agent does not keep table of previous users on a workstation.  What might help you though is described n this KB article:

       

      Technical Tip: FSSO RDP logon override https://kb.fortinet.com/k....do?externalID=FD45999

       

      Best Regards,

      Alivo

      Bitman
      BitmanAuthor
      New Member
      March 7, 2020

      Hi Alivo,

       

      thanks very much for pointing me to this KB, that will probably solve my problem !

       

      Best regards